The Christian Solution

C   S  
Home Page   About TCS   Contact Us   Document Library  
December 2015 AD


American Constitution

"allows" Judaic favor;

"bans" Islamic disfavor




Fictions of Constitutional Rights in regards to aliens

Right off the bat, arguments that it is unconstitutional not to admit Syrian Muslims is dead wrong.

Dead wrong because Syrian Muslims living in Syria have no American Constitutional rights.

That is why Obama can monitor their communications and even kill them dead with bombs from fighter jets.

This does not just apply to Islam. 

Neither did Jews of Czarist Russia, nor Jews of Nazi Germany, nor Jews of Stalinist Soviet Union, have any American constitutional rights.

Fictions of Constitutional Rights in regards to Immigration of aliens

May we start this discussion by stating that talk of allowing Syrian immigrants is mostly the result of conflict between the religion of Sunni Muslims and the religion of Shia Muslims, so that any immigrants to America would be coming here mainly for religious persecution reasons.

Really, the argument should be whether our Constitution is allowed to favor the Muslim religion being persecuted in a foreign country, even if the foreign persecution is by a sect of the same religion in that foreign country.

Instead, most argue that our Constitution demands that we take action when a religious persecution occurs in a foreign country and so, that action translates into meaning our Constitution is REQUIRED to favor that religion for immigration.

Much the exact argument made over the years for Jewish immigration into America.

Jews favored for immigration - 1880-1914

During the Russian Czar's time, members of the Judaic faith, told us they greatly feared for their lives from the devoutly Christian Czar in this devoutly Christian country.

In a "I can't believe anyone bought this argument" moment, Jews cited what Muslims in The Ottoman Empire (i.e. Turkey) were doing to Armenian Christians in Turkey, in a fraudulent means to make Americans understand what Christians in Russia "could possibly do" to Jews in Russia.

Never mind that equating Muslim treatment of Christians in a dying Ottoman Empire does not in any way equate to Christian treatment of Jews in a, by any measure,  saintly Christian Russia.

Jewish propaganda worked.

For immigration purposes into America, Russian Jews became a favored religion, because don't you know, as Jews tell us, our Constitution was written so that religious persecution in Russia mandates religious favoritism in America.

Unconstitutional as hell, but many Americans bought the argument to favor the Judaic religion.

Note: Just so you know, the First Amendment forbids religious favoritism as well as religious persecution. Strict neutrality is required; neither carrot nor stick allowed.

Note: Just so you know, the Jews in Russia were very busy with many attempts to assassinate their Czar, until they finally succeeded, and busy with many attempts to incite their lower class into a bloody Judeo-Communist national suicide in first an 1848 Communist Revolution, followed by an 1905 Communist Revolution and finally, the successful 1917 Communist Revolution. In an action begets reaction scenario, the Jews did indeed reap a bit of religious persecution from their provocations, but the facts are that even if the Jews were the totally innocent bystanders they always tell us they are, none of this Russian business had anything to do with America and how our Constitution behaves.

Jews never had a right to religious favoritism.

And if this were a fraud case, the Jews would have been convicted and expelled from this country for their illegal entry.

Jews favored for immigration - 1933-1945

Of course, in the time of Hitler, the argument is that hateful to the bone Americans did not favor the Judaic religion, and hence, it was American Christian's fault that German Christians slaid members of the Judaic faith.

But still the Jewish argument was that members of the Judaic faith "should have been favored" by our Constitution.

Regardless of all the violins being played on this, Jews were allowed entry to America for religious reasons.

One may argue that Albert Einstein was allowed simply because he was smart, but the facts are that he was "favored" because of his religious beliefs in the face of Nazi beliefs.

Again, what did Nazi Germany have to do with our American Constitution?

More fraud in our immigration system.

Jews favored for immigration - 1945-1991


Atheist Communism, ironically created by Jews, was the argument for allowing members of the Judaic faith to immigrate to both America and Israel, after FDR's great WW2 friend Stalin, turned ugly following the Doctor's plot.

Seems to have never been the argument that Christians should have been favored for immigration into America, but no one ever concerned themselves much with freeing Christians from Russia.

Even Jewish commentator Dennis Prager admits as much.

Perhaps because Jewish Commissars had already sent all the Christian priests, ministers, bishops and others to the Gulag where they died a slow painful death, there simply was no highly devout Christians left to save.

But nevertheless, by saying that they greatly feared for their lives, America bent over backwards to favor the Judaic religious beliefs of Jews returning to the Promised Land of Israel.  And as well, allow Jews to travel into the fake Promised Land of America. 

Jews never argued it was unconstitutional to give favorable treatment to their Judaic religion.

Not when they were benefiting.

But when it comes to unfavorable treatment for Muslims, when it is Americans who fear for their lives from bloody Muslim immigration, these same Jews, like Senator Barbara Boxer, don't miss a beat and still tell Americans they must not prevent a foreign religion from the shores of America; that America cannot disfavor the Muslim religion moving into their home to hurt them.


Atheists and Jews
are Protectors of
Muslim's religion



Ain't that sweet.

Atheists who meanly and disrespectfully ridicule Christians as people who worship an "invisible man in the sky", who mock Christians praying at the terrorism of San Bernardino, are the top defenders of "the religion of tolerance" faith of Islam.

Feminists who always tell Christians to keep their religion off their body, are chanting that government cannot disallow the "religion of feminist love", Islam, from coming into America.

And the patron of them all, Jews of the ACLU, ADL, and Southern Poverty Law fame, who have ran Christ out of all public schools, now want America to allow unlimited Muslim immigration. Why?  Because "the religion of Israeli defense", Islam, needs defended from Christians.

The biggest joke on America?  

Jews' friends in "THE ONLY DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST, Israel, bans Muslims from entering Israel all the time....

BTW, Israel discriminates against Christians immigrating to Israel as well, unless they are religious tourists with lots of money to spend.

What unifies all anti-Americans? 

Hang on to your seat....

They are they are defenders of the First Amendment protect of religion.

I'm not making this up.  Really! I know it's hard to believe, but trust me.


Donald Trump says Keep Muslims Out


With Donald Trump calling for a rational immigration policy for Muslims and for the fact that every other Republican opposes him, kinda makes it hard to vote for anyone else.

Never mind that he was only suggesting a temporary stop to Muslim immigration.

Never mind that the Democrat idol, FDR, ordered AMERICAN CITIZENS of Japanese ETHNICITY into CONCENTRATION CAMPS, but according to the Jewish leftists, Hitler has just arrived since he asks that foreigners are not automatically allowed to enter America, as if they had a right to enter our country and American citizens have absolutely no right to stop them from entering.

Never mind that Trump said he would not put Muslims into Concentration Camps as FDR actually did.

Never mind that President Jimmy Carter not only disallowed any Iranian visas to be approved after the Iranian Hostage Crisis, but ordered all Iranians on American Visas to "report for processing and showing of papers".

Even though I know for a fact, that for the liberal crown jewel show of Saturday Night Live to invite Donald Trump to host their show is proof positive that the left loves the guy, even with that undeniable evidence of the right being dumped yet again, you still cannot not register the fact in your vote that there is no one else saying what you want them to say.

How can you not vote for Trump?

Since everyone else is saying was cannot stop Muslims from entering America, then a vote against Trump is a vote for more Muslim immigration -- even if once elected,  Trump will "grow in office" and allow more Muslims.

I'm afraid this is how revolutions get started, when Christian lemmings are blindly led by the Jewish MSM to back the wrong horse -- the Trojan Horse of The Donald -- and then get disillusioned from "the democratic process" when the ones they vote for always disappoints.
  1.  Barely Acceptable - Donald Trump: "total and complete shutdown (but temporary) of Muslims entering the United States"  both on immigration visas and as tourists.
  1.  Disqualified - CAIR National Executive Director Muslim (spokesman for the beheading mob) Nihad Awad: "Donald Trump sounds more like a leader of a lynch mob than a great nation like ours,"  "He and others are playing into the hands of ISIS. This is exactly what ISIS wants from Americans: to turn against each other."
  1.  Disqualified - White House spokesman Josh Earnest (of the darker element Obama): accused Trump of playing on people's fears and trying to tap into "a darker side, a darker element" of American society.
  1.  Disqualified - Bernie Sanders: "Trump and others want us to hate all Muslims (as he has us hate Capitalists"
  1.  Disqualified - Hillary Clinton: called the proposal "reprehensible, prejudiced and divisive."  (Really???  She said that?)
  1.  Disqualified - (Foolish) Sen. John McCain of Arizona" "It's just foolish."
  1.  Disqualified - South Carolina Republican Chairman Matt Moore, whose state is third on the primary voting calendar: "as a conservative who truly cares about religious liberty (of Muslims but not of the Christians who will be beheaded later), Donald Trump's bad idea and rhetoric send a shiver down my spine."
  1.  Disqualified - U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, on Tuesday urged fellow Republicans to swiftly reject Trump (and accept any of the other wimps running for President). "This is not a policy debate," he told MSNBC. "You need to stand up for our party and our country."
  1.  Disqualify - Speaker Paul Ryan: the plan is "not conservatism" and was not in the nation's interest. (Yes, it is in the nation's interest to become Muslim)
  1.  Disqualified - Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law expert at George Washington University. “This would not only violate international law, but do so by embracing open discrimination against one religion. It would make the United States a virtual pariah among nations.’’ (Is he talking about Israel here?)
  1.  Disqualified - Jeb Bush: "Donald Trump is unhinged" (as is Jeb's campaign)
  1.  Disqualified - Carly Fiorina: "Trump's overreaction is as dangerous as President Obama's under-reaction."  (And Carly is j-u-s-t right. Vote for me.)
  1.  Disqualified - John Kasich: "outrageous divisiveness" (Because Islam will unite us)
  1.  Disqualified - Ted Cruz: "Well, that is not my policy."  (OK, what then is your policy)
  1.  Disqualified - Ben Carson: not advocate "being selective on one's religion" but does believe that "everyone visiting our country should register and be monitored during their stay." (thought every foreigner has always been registered  upon entry through customs since Ellis Island times, Mexicans exception, as is true now for every American since 911. Yelp, that is working as we find that the government knew a whole lot more of these guys and did not stop them)
  1.  Disqualified - New Hampshire state GOP's chair, Jennifer Horn: the idea "un-Republican. It is unconstitutional. And it is un-American." (Un-American to allow un-Americans into America.
  1.  DIsqualified - Former aide to Republican President George W. Bush, Ari Fleischer: "Under Trump, the King Abdullah of Jordan, who is fighting ISIS, won't be allowed in the US to talk about how to fight ISIS." (How does that fit  the Trump category of "immigrant or tourist"?)

I know what Ted Cruz's policy would be.

Ted Cruz would only allow Jews into America and no other religion.  When persecuted Middle Eastern Christians invited him to talk, he turned it into being  all about everyone supporting Israel, proving that Ted Cruz is yet another bought off Judas Christian.

Ben Carson was the biggest disappointment. He is supposed to be the Christian standard bearer.

None of the Republicans go far enough, not even Donald Trump, since none will make it their policy to deport the Muslims already here.

But once again, Judeo-Journalists in their own hypocritic words give us the clear unmistakable reason why they are dead wrong.


Immigration based upon Jewish Religion


First, the setup, the lie that our immigration has never been based upon religion.

Leti Volpp, a University of California expert on immigration law, "there is no precedent for a religious litmus test for admitting immigrants into the United States."

"Excluding almost a quarter of the world's population from setting foot in the United States based solely upon their religious identity would never pass constitutional muster," Volpp said.

Then the truth that just a mere few years ago, Jews the Judaic faith made themselves the exception.

Religion can factor into immigration decisions, but that typically happens when people are fleeing religious persecution. People of a particular religion may get favorable treatment by the United States, as when Russian Jews sought to leave the Soviet Union.

Ironically, these same people recently were complaining that in the 1930's, we did not allow Jews in based on their religion.

How horrible that our Constitution was being followed. 

How horrible that we did not allow Jewish immigrants by favoring their religion!

Here's the rub.

If Jews fear Christians in Nazi Germany or if Jews fear Christians in the Soviet Union, based upon their religion, then the argument becomes that German Jews and Russian Jews must absolutely be allowed into Christian  America. 

The danger against the Jewish religion is real we are told and so "Damm the Constitution".

Jews must be allowed into our country, from places we have no control over, even from countries with the exact same religions as ourselves, because Jews are in danger for their actions in other parts of the world.

Yes, Jews can fear for their lives, so that trumps everything else.

But in reverse, if American Christians fear for their own lives from Muslims entering their own country, then our own people are not allowed to fear.

These Jews mock us for fearing. 

These Jews mock us for giving Christian prayer in a mass murder.

Under Jewish rules in interpretations, Americans are not allowed to prohibit their future Muslim tormentors, because the Constitution says so.

Under Jewish rules and interpretations, our Christians Founding Fathers wanted to favor the Judaic religion and at the same time, wanted to insure the Islamic religion was not disfavored in America, just because Christians of the Christian religion have no right to fear for their own religion.

Jews like Senator Barbara Boxer tells us fearful Christians that there is no need to feel unsafe, because her gun control policies have made Californians safe in their places of work.

The audacity of this Judeo-statement is staggering.

Too bad Donald Trump was not around a hundred years ago when Jewess Barbara Boxer's relatives were trying to shame America into allowing Jews to move to America en mass.

Had Donald Trump been born a hundred years ago, we would not have the problems we have today.

That is, IF THIS FICTIONAL TRUMP REALLY DID BACK THEN WHAT HE TOLD US HE WOULD DO.



MOUNT PLEASANT, S.C. (AP) — Donald Trump called Monday for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States," an idea swiftly condemned by his rival GOP candidates for president and other Republicans.

The proposed ban would apply to immigrants and visitors alike, a sweeping prohibition affecting all adherents of Islam who want to come to the U.S. The idea faced an immediate challenge to its legality and feasibility from experts who could point to no formal exclusion of immigrants based on religion in America's history.

Trump's campaign said in a statement such a ban should stand "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on." It said the proposal comes in response to a level of hatred among "large segments of the Muslim population" toward Americans.

"Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life," Trump said in the statement.

At an evening rally in South Carolina, Trump supporters cheered and shouted in support as he read his statement. Trump warned during his speech that without drastic action, the threat of attacks is "going to get worse and worse."

Since the Paris attacks, a number of Republican presidential contenders have proposed restrictions on Syrian refugees — with several suggesting preference for Christians seeking asylum — and tighter surveillance in the U.S.

But Trump's proposed ban goes much further than those ideas, and his Republican rivals were quick to reject the latest provocation from a candidate who has delivered no shortage of them.

"Donald Trump is unhinged," Jeb Bush said via Twitter. "His 'policy' proposals are not serious."

Carly Fiorina said, "Trump's overreaction is as dangerous as President Obama's under-reaction."

John Kasich slammed Trump's "outrageous divisiveness," while a more measured Ted Cruz, who has always been cautious about upsetting Trump's supporters, said, "Well, that is not my policy."

Ben Carson said he would not advocate "being selective on one's religion" but does believe that "everyone visiting our country should register and be monitored during their stay."

And in the early voting state of New Hampshire, the state GOP's chair, Jennifer Horn, called the idea "un-Republican. It is unconstitutional. And it is un-American."

Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said Trump's proposed ban would apply to "everybody," including Muslims seeking immigration visas as well as tourists seeking to enter the country.

His campaign did not immediately respond to questions about whether it would also include Muslims who are U.S. citizens and travel outside of the country, including members of the military, or how a determination of someone's religion might be made by customs and border officials.

Instead, Trump said via a campaign spokeswoman: "Because I am so politically correct, I would never be the one to say. You figure it out!"

There are more than 5,800 servicemen and women on active U.S. military duty and in the reserves who self-identify as Muslim and could be assigned to serve overseas. Trump said in an interview Monday night on Fox News, "They'll come home."

Trump was also unclear on whether his ban would apply to Muslim allies in the fight against Islamic State militants. Ari Fleischer, a former aide to Republican President George W. Bush, tweeted, "Under Trump, the King Abdullah of Jordan, who is fighting ISIS, won't be allowed in the US to talk about how to fight ISIS."

But at Trump's rally in South Carolina, the proposed ban struck supporter Shelley Choquette as reasonable, because "it's not going to be forever. I think everybody needs to be checked."

Religion can factor into immigration decisions, but that typically happens when people are fleeing religious persecution. People of a particular religion may get favorable treatment by the United States, as when Russian Jews sought to leave the Soviet Union.

In the late 1800s, Congress passed legislation broadly aimed at halting Chinese immigration. But said Leti Volpp, a University of California expert on immigration law, "there is no precedent for a religious litmus test for admitting immigrants into the United States."

"Excluding almost a quarter of the world's population from setting foot in the United States based solely upon their religious identity would never pass constitutional muster," Volpp said.

Trump's proposal comes a day after President Barack Obama spoke to the nation from the Oval Office about the shootings in San Bernardino, California, which Obama said was "an act of terrorism designed to kill innocent people."

The FBI said Monday the Muslim couple who carried out the massacre had been radicalized and had taken target practice at area gun ranges, in one case within days of the attack last week that killed 14 people.

Trump's campaign has been marked by a pattern of inflammatory statements, dating back to his harsh rhetoric about Mexican immigrants. He has taken a particularly hard line against Muslims in the days since the Paris attacks, advocating enhanced surveillance of mosques due to fears over radicalization.

"Donald Trump sounds more like a leader of a lynch mob than a great nation like ours," said Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. "He and others are playing into the hands of ISIS. This is exactly what ISIS wants from Americans: to turn against each other."

White House spokesman Josh Earnest accused Trump of playing on people's fears and trying to tap into "a darker side, a darker element" of American society.

From the Democratic presidential campaign, Bernie Sanders said "Trump and others want us to hate all Muslims" and Hillary Clinton called the proposal "reprehensible, prejudiced and divisive."

On Capitol Hill, Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona said, "It's just foolish."

But will it hurt Trump in the campaign? "I have no idea," McCain said. "I thought long ago that things he said would hurt his prospects, and he continues to go up."

___

Associated Press writers Mark Sherman, Laurie Kellman, Josh Lederman and Alan Fram in Washington and Bruce Smith and Bill Barrow in South Carolina contributed to this report.




You can read further at The Problem
You can read further at Guide to "Checks and Balances"
You can read further at The Solution
Write us at letters@thechristiansolution.com



Article located at:
http://www.thechristiansolution.com/doc2015/715_MuslimExclusion.html


Last Hope for America
Christian Libertarian: Harmonious Union
of
Church and State

The Christian Solution             First Release: March 15, 2008