Sept 27, 2009
Islam is un-Constitutional
William J. Federer
Quran vs. Constitution: Why they're incompatible
Dalla Morning News
Downtown Dallas terror plot no cause for panic
It was there, according to the FBI, in the bowels of the 60-story Fountain Place, where Smadi parked an SUV loaded with a fake bomb similar to the one Timothy McVeigh detonated when he killed 168 people in the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.
-- September 24th, 2009 attempt to destroy the emerald green 60-story Fountain Place Hi-Rise in downtown Dallas
With the attempted total destruction of the Dallas Fountain Place foiled by the FBI, Muslim terrorists demonstrate once again that they want the total destruction of America and our submission to Islam.
And this is associated by the media-Scribes in their news report with Timothy McVeigh who blew up the Murrah building.
If you remember, the Oklahoma City Murrah Federal building housed the same BATF who were responsible for the Waco massacre of an entire Christian denomination. -- and the same government who by the way, lets non-Christian vermin like Hosam Maher Husein Smadi sneak into this country from Jordan and live in peace here, until they invariably break the peace.
Michael McVeigh attacked a government building containing the untried, unpunished, unrepentant guilty genocidal mass-murderers of a sect of Christians. (The media-Scribes, of course, portrayed the attack as merely an attack on a day care center that just happened to be in the same government building.)
Hosam Maher Husein Smadi, on the other hand, wanted to blow up a civilian building full of innocent Americans who never hurt anyone.
Not to condone any taking of life, but how can anyone seriously equate the two!
Timothy McVeigh can possibly be characterized as an (albeit misguided) American patriot and defender of Christianity; while Hosam Smadi is a Jordanian anti-American, anti-Christian devil.
Why do our "Jewish allies" in the media always make a big deal of Christian Timothy McVeigh, but you only hear a whimper about Muslim Hosam Smadi types?
Who exactly was Muhammad?
Muhammad was not just a religious leader, creating the holy book called the Koran.
He was a political leader, who created a political system called Sharia Law.
He was a military leader, who commanded Muslim armies across the Saudi Arabian desert.
When we accept Islam here in America, we cannot help but to accept the politics and militancy of Islam.
Where does that leave our Constitution, which clearly outlines our politics and our military in clearly non-Islamic ways?
Our Constitution was created by Christians and is wholly compatible with Christianity -- all denominations of Christianity -- and NOTHING ELSE!
But, it will never be compatible with Islam.
American Muslims will always owe a military, political, as well as an expected religious allegiance, toward Mecca.
In days of old, Protestant Christians falsely portrayed Roman Catholic Christians as having a political allegiance to the Christian Pope -- a foreign figure.
But neither Jesus nor any Pope ever became a military leader.
Neither Jesus nor any Pope ever became political leaders; although, they do set fine ethical and moral examples for the secular rulers and held them to high standards.
Not so with Muslims.
Muslims will always be imitating the example of Muhammad in terms of both war and politics.
Every tenet of Islam violates pretty much each and every one of the Ten Commandments, as William Federer outlines below.
Therefore, Islam is un-Constitutional.
One cannot be Muslim and a U.S. citizen at the same time.
There cannot be dual "citizenship" in such a case.
Quran vs. Constitution: Why they're incompatible
By William J. Federer
President Barack Obama stated in Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009: "When the first Muslim American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the … Holy Quran."
The dilemma is: How can one swear to defend something upon a book that promotes the opposite?
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion, yet the Quran states in Sura 4:89, "Those who reject Islam must be killed. If they turn back (from Islam), take hold of them and kill them wherever you find them."
In Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari (Vol. 9, Book 84, No. 57), Muhammad said: "Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him."
Islamic law relegates non-Muslims to "dhimmi" status, where they are not to propagate their customs amongst Muslims and cannot display a Cross or a Star of David.
The First Amendment states Congress shall not abridge "the freedom of speech," yet Islamic law enforces dhimmi status on non-Muslims, prohibiting them from observing their religious practices publicly, raising their voices during prayer or ringing church bells.
The First Amendment states Congress cannot take away "the right of the people to peaceably assemble," yet Islamic law states non-Muslims cannot build any new places of worship or repair any old places Muslims have destroyed; they must allow Muslims to participate in their private meetings; they cannot bring their dead near the graveyards of Muslims or mourn their dead loudly.
The First Amendment states Congress cannot take away the right of the people "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances," yet Islamic law states non-Muslims are not to harbor any hostility toward the Islamic state or give comfort to those who disagree with Islamic government.
All our founders' inspiring, biblical quotes in one place – a must-have for your library. Get Bill Federer's "America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations"
The Second Amendment states, "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," yet Islamic law states non-Muslims cannot possess arms, swords or weapons of any kind.
The Third Amendment states one cannot be forced to "quarter" someone in their house, yet Islamic law states non-Muslims must entertain and feed for three days any Muslim who wants to stay in their home, and for a longer period if the Muslim falls ill – and they cannot prevent Muslim travelers from staying in their places of worship.
The Fourth Amendment guarantees "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures," yet Islamic law states if a non-Muslim rides on a horse with a saddle and bridle, the horse can be taken away.
The Fifth Amendment states that "no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime … without due process of law," yet Muhammad said, "No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir (infidel)" (Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, No. 50).
The Sixth Amendment guarantees a "public trial by an impartial jury" and the Seventh Amendment states "the right of trial by jury shall be preserved," yet Islamic law does not give non-Muslims equal legal standing with Muslims, even prohibiting a non-Muslim from testifying in court against a Muslim.
The Eighth Amendment states there shall be no "cruel and unusual punishments inflicted," yet the Quran states:
"Cut off the hands of thieves, whether they are male or female, as punishment for what they have done – a deterrent from Allah" (Sura 5:38).
A raped woman is punished:
"The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication – flog each of them with a hundred stripes" (Sura 24:2).
Women can be beaten:
"If you experience rebellion from the women, you shall first talk to them, then (you may use negative incentives like) deserting them in bed, then you may (as a last alternative) beat them (Sura 4:34).
Honor killings of wives and daughters who have embarrassed their families have been reported by the United Nations in Muslim populations of Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Syria, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Yemen and increasing in Western nations.
The 13th Amendment states there shall be no "slavery or involuntary servitude," yet the Quran accommodates slavery as Muhammad owned slaves.
The 14th Amendment guarantees citizens "equal protection of the laws," yet the Quran does not consider Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims as equal to Muslims before the law.
Referring to Jews as "the People of the Book," Muhammad said: "They are those whom Allah has cursed; who have been under his wrath; some of whom were turned into apes and swine" (Sura 5:60, 7:166, 2:65).
The 15th Amendment guarantees "the right of the citizens ... to vote shall not be denied ... on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude," yet the fundamentalist interpretation of Islamic law does not allow voting, as democracy is considered people setting themselves in the place of Allah by making their own laws.
The 16th Amendment has some similarities with Islamic law, as "Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes from whatever source derived." Muhammad said, "Fight those who believe not in Allah … until they pay the jizya [tax] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29).
The 18th Amendment has some similarities with Islamic law, as "the manufacture, sale, or transportation
of intoxicating liquors … for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited."
The 19th Amendment allows women to vote, yet in strict Islamic countries women cannot vote.
The 21st Amendment allows for the sale of liquor, yet Islamic law prohibits non-Muslims from selling or drinking wine and liquor openly.
One would assume that to swear upon a book implies believing what is in that book.
As Muhammad was not just a religious leader, but also a political and military leader, Islam is not just a religious system, but also a political and military system.
Since no one has the authority to demand Muslims worldwide cease imitating the political/military example of Muhammad, when Muslims bow in prayer they are also pledging political/military allegiance to Mecca.
Swearing to defend the U.S. Constitution upon a Quran that promotes different values is a dilemma worthy of a presidential explanation.
You can read further at The Problem
You can read further at The Solution
Article located at: