The Christian Solution

C   S  
Home Page   About TCS   p Contact Us   Document Library  
July 2014 AD

The Jewish Pharaoh

Jews describe themselves in the Bible as a poor enslaved tribe in Egypt with no power or influence, who had to be liberated  from a cruel all-powerful Pharaoh by Moses and God.

Being that we can now for the first time in 2,000 years, actually read what the Egyptians had to say about their side of the story as easily as we can read the Old Testament handed to us by the Jews, it would behoove us to compare the two stories.

Interestingly, the Egyptian side of the story carries more weight, as the ORIGINAL hieroglyphic writings of the Egyptians are literally WRITTEN IN STONE!

The premise and twist to the Moses story presented here is that Egypt had control of Palestine at the time, thus making Jews citizens in the Egyptian empire. The Jews took advantage of this situation to become quite powerful and influential in Egyptian life, but eventually were expelled from Egypt by the Pharaoh as undesirables for their corruption and dominance over Egyptian life. Probably one step ahead of the Egyptian people who were on the verge of rebellion if matters were not straightened out and fast.

It is quite likely that the story of the Hyksos is the story that eventually, through generations of revisionist retelling, became the myth of the Exodus.

Jewish Christ Superstar

The global Jewish entertainment system has just failed in a new tour of the Rock/Mock Musical, "Jesus Christ Superstar", but it did not fail for a lack of trying.

Their slick Judeo-production of a show which turns the Christian martyrdom of Jesus Christ into a splashy pop spectacle made me contemplate how Jews may present historical events in other areas.

Perhaps fundamental Jewish stories such as Moses may, in truth, be highly embellished Jewish productions of real historical events and not really reflect what actually happened.

Dangerous grounds for this site to pursue as it may be used to undermine Christianity itself, but the parallels of modern Jewish behavior surrounding us is hard to ignore.

Since the 1948 second founding of Israel immediately after WW2 was such a momentous Moses-like event for Jews, we should review the actual history of WW2 from a Christian perspective, as opposed to how Jews are actively recording history for us about WW2 and the subsequent founding of modern Israel which resulted from it.

Once we are done with examining the latest establishment of Israel, we will later explore the original establishment of Israel.

The Promised Land - Part 2

There can be no doubt that the Jews were completely victorious in WW2.

The Crimean War insured that Christians would not get the Holy Lands from the crumbling Muslim Ottoman Empire.

WW1 obtained Palestine for Jewish control.

Then came the Pharaoh Hitler in 1933.

The Pharaoh Hitler looked like he may have been a huge setback to Zionism which had started in earnest in the mid 1800's.

Indeed, Hitler had taken over their Jewish-ran Wiemar Republic simply because the Jews running the Wiemar Republic had managed so successfully in running Germany into the ground, but now Jews were once again safe -- Hitler was dead. 

Stalin was still in power with his Judeo-Communist suppression of Christianity in his on-going Jewish-ran Gulag concentration camps.

England was still under the Jewish thumb of Jewish financial control and America was well on its way to being dragged under their control.

Best yet, the nation of Israel was being birthed -- the goal of Jews for almost 2,000 years.

These were glorious, victorious, historic days for Jews the world over.

So how did the Jewish MSM choose to portray WW2?

Instead of bragging to the world of their triumphant and historic victory, they instead show it as a huge Jewish disaster!!!!

The fantasy developed of long suffering Jews returning to their Promised Land because all the rest of the world were constantly beating up on them.

The Holocaust disaster was portrayed as only against Jews; not the burned out German and English cities filled with Christians, not the legions of dead Russian Christian soldiers buried in their Leningrad ghost town, not the Holodomor of  7 million starved  Ukrainian Christians, not the tens of millions of Red Terror or Stalin terror victims.

Tales of Jewish woe abound though -- tales of devastation, destruction, persecution, deprivation, cruelty, inhumanity, first from German Christians in WW2 and then from Palestinian Muslims blocking their illegal entry to Palestine -- of all the nerve!

Jewish movie producers made hundreds of Holocaust movies about the plight of the poor Jews, but not one movie about the Holodomor of 7 million Christians in Jewish hands.

How will the Neo-Talmud of the year 2525 record our history?

One thing will be sure -- There will be recorded no word of Christian suffering in WW2, for that would distract from the Jewish-based story they want to tell.

The Talmud in the year 2525 will record that the Jews suffered great burdens placed upon them by Christians, but God came to their aid and finally redeemed them with a restored Promised  Land.

No mention will be made in this Judiazed telling of the truth that this second deliverance was only made possible with the help of American, English and Russian Christians.

No mention will be made of American and Russian Christians fighting German Christians in the defense of Jews; German Christians who were themselves fighting against Jewish-ran communism enslaving the world.

No mention will be made of the hundreds of billions of dollars in military and economic aid given by Christians to help establish this religious Judaic nation.

World War 2 will be boiled down to little more than the Pharaoh Hitler ruthlessly enslaving Jews and pursuing a Holocaust against their poor suffering innocents.

Hitler will be portrayed as Pharaoh while Ben Guiron will be depicted as Israel's second Moses.

This site has already exposed how the Holocaust of WW2 was richly embellished by the Jewish Hollywood producer Billy Wilder, in  conspiracy with  Hollywood screenwriters along with an American military psychological warfare department ran by Jews in WW2 with half-Jew Dwight Eisenhower running interference for them, when they "documented" the German labor camps for all time.  (But no Stalinist gulag camps)

The gall Jews have of presenting Dwight Eisenhower, the world's highest military leader against the Germans in WW2, as an ethnic German. Only a Jew could be trusted with such an important task!

So given how twisted contemporary history has been manipulated by Jews, in front of our very eyes, how much more could the Jews have elaborated, distorted -- even twisted history completely around between Jews and Egyptians, where Jews are portrayed as always weak suffering innocent victims, instead of being properly presented as a powerful threatening minority over a subjugated Egypt?

The story of Moses was that portrayal of innocent suffering Jews at the hands of an all powerful Egyptian empire. But can it be believed by someone with an open mind?

Indeed, we find evidence of the real truth of history, unearthed in Egyptian records we can now read for the first time, literally cut in stone so that we know we are getting original documents, which show the other side of the story -- that Egypt was the victim in the time of Moses, not the Jews.

Could this be the real story of Moses?

The Promised Land, Part 1

Even the Jewish accounts in the Bible tell of Moses being an Egyptian royal.

What this says is that Moses was in line to be Pharaoh!  In and of itself, hardly the story of a suffering people at the hands of an evil dictator!

How this happened is truly intriguing.

The Jewish story is that Moses was not a blood relative to the Pharaoh, but  rather adopted from birth after his Jewish mother put the baby Moses into a basket along the Nile where it floated past the Pharaoh's home.

In truth, Moses was either the actual blood son of a Jewish Pharaoh or a Jewish boy adopted by a Jewish Pharaoh, or at worst, a Jewish boy adopted by an Egyptian Pharaoh - who was but a mere puppet of Jewish manipulators.

Far from the one-sided account of Jews being an absolute enslaved outcast class as portrayed in the story of Moses, even the Bible tells of Jews who had great influence over Egyptian power, as in the story of Joseph becoming the chief adviser to the Pharaoh.

A Pharaoh who by the way, allowed these poor suffering Israelites, who were suffering from a drought in their own country, to immigrate into his verdant Nile delta basin paradise. 

Abraham, Jacob and the sons of Jacob were all welcome as refugees in Egypt. Again, hardly the story of a cruel evil Pharaoh.

If Jewish Joseph was a slave, it was only because his Jewish brothers sold him into slavery, not because the Pharaoh rounded up Jews Kristallnatch-style.

Remarkably, the story of Israeli-immigrant Joseph becoming the chief adviser to the Pharaoh of Egypt is not unlike the story of Israeli-immigrant Rahm Emanuel becoming the White House Chief of Staff as the chief adviser to the Pharaoh of America, Barrack Obama.

At best, the Bible tells us that the Pharaoh was an Egyptian puppet moved by Jewish hands, ever as much the puppet as Barrack Obama guided by Jewish hands.

If this is true, then Jews would not have been suffering nearly as badly as they wrote in the Bible, but instead would had been in a position to make the Egyptians suffer.

Indeed, to cause the Egyptian people to suffer so much that they finally agreed to "Let my people go!"

OR, to DEMAND that the JEWS GO AWAY!

Indeed!  Did the drought-escaping Israelis bite the hand which fed them and sought to take over power and control from the Egyptian people so greatly that protests from the suffering Egyptian people in their own lands become so great that the Egyptian Pharaoh had no recourse but to strip them of all power to the point they became slaves under him for their own protection?   No doubt!

The story of Moses then would have been written as a Holocaust event - that is, entirely written as a fairy tale, twisted entirely from reality to reflect the exact opposite of what happened.

Jesus-rejecting Jews often say that a single poor Jewish man named Christ, among millions of poor Jews, never existed because if he had existed, they would have deemed it important enough to have written something about him in their Talmud. (They did, but it is not a nice thing they wrote about Christ). 

Yet, when 2 million Jews leave a population of around 4.5 million Egyptians, and not a single account is written about it in Egyptian hieroglyphics, are we to assume that a instantaneous 30% reduction in population had no significant affect on the life and economy of Egypt which Egyptians cared to write about. 

Modern studies of Egyptian hieroglyphics have revealed these secrets and the story we are now getting from the Egyptian side of the story can for the first time be compared to the Jewish side of history, which the Jews have recorded in their part of the Bible.


As a student of human nature, I've found that the best lies always have a grain of truth in them. I've also observed that one particularly effective type of lie is the one where the liar reverses things. If you are a liar, for instance, you accuse someone else of lying. One of the best examples you'll ever find of that is when the Bush administration accused Saddam Hussein of lying about WMDs.

Anyway, I'm quite a ways off on a tangent here since the subject is the Exodus, but I thought I would lay a foundation for the subject and for my question. Did the author of the Exodus pull a classic switcheroo by reversing the facts? Or, more specifically, were the Hebrews forcibly ejected from Egypt as undesirables rather than escaping by parting the Red Sea, etc? Here's what one writer says about the Exodus:

 "The fact is that with all that is known of Egyptian history from this time (since scholars can now read the records the ancient Egyptians with the ease of a modern newspaper), and the fact that the history of Egypt in this period is well documented, there is no evidence from the records of Egypt itself that the events of Exodus ever occurred, either archaeologically or documentarily in the manner in which the Bible describes the events.

The reality is that if

  • a series of plagues had been visited upon Egypt,
  • thousands of slaves escaped in a mass runaway,
  • and the army of the Pharaoh were swallowed up by the Red Sea,
such events would doubtless have made it into the Egyptian documentary record.

Instead, what we do have from Egyptian sources is a remarkably different story of the Exodus.

From about the beginning of the second millenium B.C.E., through about 1200 B.C.E., Egypt ruled the region known today as Palestine.

How do we know this?

We know it not only from Egyptian records themselves, which talk about tribute taken from the various towns and cities in Canaan, but from archaeological evidence within the region itself, which shows a number of settlements which were clearly Egyptian military outposts.

 During this time, the region which was to become the land of Israel, occupying the northern highlands between the coastal plain and the valley of the Jordan River, was sparsely populated and densely forested with stands of oak and terebinth trees.

This land was populated by one of two groups (we're not sure which), either the Apiru or Shoshu peoples.

The former were known to have originated as itinerant nomads, largely on the fringes of lowland society, who may have taken refuge in the highlands, or the Shosu, a more cohesive, well-defined group.

The linguistic association of Apiru (sometimes Habiru) with the word, "Hebrew" had long, in the minds of scholars, been considered good evidence that this was the group that gave rise to the Hebrews, but we now know that the association wasn't quite that simple. The name may have been from that source, but the people probably weren't.

 In any event, the highlands of northern Palestine which was home to the Kingdom of Israel has a highly variable climate. Agricultural productivity, and the ability of people to sustain trade with the lowlands, was subject to varying climatic conditions, meaning that famine was a frequent occurrence. When crops failed and trade could not be sustained, it was not uncommon for people to flee the region and head for refuge where crops were dependable. The nearest such place was the Nile delta in Egypt.

 So many of the "Hebrews" (culturally indistinct from the Canaanites at this time), who were citizens of Egypt, fled to the Nile delta.

Time and again.

Every time there was a famine in Judah, Israel or Canaan, refugees headed for Egypt.

The event was so common, and the refugees so numerous, that they eventually became a substantial minority group, influential in Egypt, where they were known as the Hyksos, as is now very clear from the archaeological record.

The story of the expulsion of the Hyksos is easily the closest parallel we have from either the Egyptian record or the archaeological record to the story of the Exodus as recorded in the Bible.

There are problems, though.

Besides the Exodus story line, the biggest problem is the dates: the Bible places the Exodus at about 1200 B.C.E., yet the story of the Hyksos culminates in 1570 B.C.E.

It is quite likely that the story of the Hyksos is the story that eventually, through generations of revisionistic retelling, became the myth of the Exodus
-- another example of history being rewritten to flatter the storytellers rather than to record the unvarnished truth.

 Anyway, the Hyksos grew in influence until they eventually took control of Egypt, which they ruled, with considerable cruelty and tyranny during the Fifteenth Dynasty, beginning in 1670 B.C.E.

The Egyptians had finally had enough, though, and rebelled against the rule of the Hyksos and drove them out a century later in 1570 B.C.E.

They weren't just driven out, either; the Egyptians pushed them back into Canaan with considerable force, driving them all the way to the Syrian frontier, sacking and burning Canaanite cities along the way.

Sometime later, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, Avaris, in the eastern Nile delta, was razed to the ground by the Pharoah Ahmose, who chased the last remnants of the Hyksos back into Canaan and even laid siege to Sharuhen, the main Canaanite citadel, destroying it and ending Canaanite influence there.

At least one historian claims (a millennium after the fact) that the Hyksos refugees settled in Jerusalem and built a temple there, but the archaeological record does not support the claim of either a temple or large numbers of refugees in Jerusalem from this period.

The story of the Exodus is clearly mythmaking designed to portray a possible forced expulsion of oppressors as an escape of victims. . .


You can read further at The Problem
You can read further at Guide to "Checks and Balances"
You can read further at The Solution
Write us at

Article located at:

Last Hope for America
Christian Libertarian: Harmonious Union
Church and State

The Christian Solution             First Release: March 15, 2008