The Christian Solution C   S  
Home Page   About TCS   Contact Us   Document Library  
May 31, 2010

Christian Free Elections
Jewish Central Planning?


Bob Unruh
White House 'explanation' suggests criminal 'evasion'

We have seen central planning to be at odds with both "free trade" as well as "private property".

Now we will show how central planning is at odds with "free elections" of free citizens, as if that is not already obvious to everyone.

    "The Sestak Memorandum revealed that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel dispatched former President Bill Clinton to offer Rep. Sestak a position on a presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board in exchange for abandoning the Pennsylvania Democratic Primary."

    In an interview taped of Feb. 18, 2010, Rep. Sestak stated that the administration offered him a 'high-ranking' federal job if he would not challenge Sen. Arlen Specterů Even if we suspend our disbelief that the White House asked a former U.S. president to call on a member of Congress to offer a mere unpaid advisory position in exchange for dropping out of a Senate race, the facts alleged in the Sestak memorandum still appear to violate several sections of the United States Code."

    -- Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.; Lamar Smith, R-Texas; and James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., said in a letter to the White House.

  • Rahm Emanuel is Jewish
  • Senator Arlen Spector is Jewish
  • A Jewish Emanuel tried to help a fellow Jewish Senator Arlen Spector get elected.
  • More shades of Jewish central planning by a Jewish oligarchy.

    How elections are supposed
    to take place in America

    First off, Senators are supposed to represent the State and prior to the enactment of the 17th Amendment in 1913, Senators would have been appointed from below by our more knowledgable State representatives forming our State legislatures and not from above by the federal central government.

    Favoritism, behind-the-scenes wrangling and deal-making by State Machines, such as Illinois still has today, was the reason given for the enactment of the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    To our utter surprise and dismay, favoritism, behind-the-scenes wrangling and deal-making at the federal level shows that the 17th Amendment is flat out worst than the method the Founding Fathers originally gave us of political power spread out and distributed between the checks and balances of the States in the Senate on one hand and the People in the House on the other hand.

    Prior to 1913 and the 17th Amendment, at least we could keep corruption isolated in Illinois or New York, but now corruption moved up to the White House and infects all of America.

    At the State level, if I had a corrupt State government, I could at least move to a non-corrupt State which represented my interests -- Not so with a corrupt federal government.

    What happened with the enactment of the 17th, was that in driving the selection of Senators even lower, into the hands of voting citizens of the State, we are seeing how elections can now be manipulated at the central government level without our knowlege.

    Already, we have seen how Obama's former Senate seat in Illinois was sold to the highest bidder by Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich. (How in the hell did a single Governor get to decide upon the selection of a U.S. Senator for an entire State anyway, when we changed from having a handful of elected legislators hand off that responsibility to millions of state citizens?)

    Now the Pennsylvania Senate seat was to be kept in the Jewish hands of Arlen Spector, by Jewish Rahm Emanuel trying to remove a choice for the people of Pennsylvania to select as their Senator.

    This is tampering with a State Election against Christians, much as the voting of blacks was tampered with in the South in a previous era.

    Central planning of elections by way of bribes, coercion, fraud, and intimidation are the antithesis of the meaning of free elections and are reminiscent of the elections in third world countries.

    So, shall we repeal the 17th Amendment now and force the slightly more virtuous State legislatures to decide upon who represents their own State at the federal government level?

    To let the 17th Amendment stand would allow Jewish central planners to continue manipulating Christian free elections and turning them into sham elections of two false choices, neither of which the Christian voters truly want, neither of which would represent their true interests.

    You can read further at The Problem.
    You can read further at Guide to "Checks and Balances".
    You can read further at The Solution.
    Article located at:
  • Last Hope for America
    Christian Libertarian: Harmonious Union
    Church and State

    The Christian Solution ©             First Release: March 15, 2008