The Christian Solution

C   S  
Home Page   About TCS   Contact Us   Document Library  
February 2022 AD


  Proof Holocaust faked



Here is the "2000 mules" evidence of the Holocaust propaganda exposed and proved to be the total and blatant fraud it always was.

Just like in 2000 mules, technology has uncovered and exposed the criminal lying.

All we have to do is prove that the key lynch-pin for THE BIG LIE, that of the Auschwitz concentration camp, to be a lie and that lie will expose the entire  Holocaust story as a lie.

Auschwitz leadership
 

The rest of the world first learned of Enigma in 1974. We learned that the British had cracked the German Enigma code early in the war.

Enigma

This meant that the British knew where all the German subs were located. They knew when the German air raids would happen. They knew how the war was going in Russia. The Germans trusted Enigma with military intelligence on their army, navy and air force.

Was not until 1981 that we found that Enigma was also used by the German police, SD and SS.

The decoded records did not become available to the public until 1997.

Of critical Important to world history, we finally found the real truth about what was happening at the German concentration camps with the Jews.

Unfiltered by Jewish world news propaganda organizations.

Did we find mass gassings? No

Did we find mass crematoriums? No

Did we find mass burials? No

Did we find mass burning of bodies? No

In the daily report back to Berlin, we find in the decoded Enigma messages that the major cause of death at Auschwitz to be disease and find there were routine executions by hanging and firing squads.

Instead of Holocaust level murders at Auschwitz of 2,000 people per day, we find only 2,000 people per month dying or being transfered to other camps. This is a yearly difference of 24,000 versus the reported lie of 730,000. A large discrepancy indeed.

Again, nothing in the decoded messages about Auschwitz meeting any proscribed agenda of a quota of gassings. No mention of gassing at all.

Apologists suggest that Jews were immediately gassed upon arrival and hence were not reported to Himmler. But that is ridiculous. Why would a so-called genocidal killer not be interested to know how many Jews were killed but instead only wanted to know how many died of typhus?

How would Berlin know how much Zyklon B to send for the gas chambers or coke for the crematories if the number of the Final Solution to the Jewish Question was not being reported?

Of course the answer is because there never was a Final Solution.

Today we question every lie told about Trump by the Jewish propagandists, but we still seem to have a hard time questioning the lies of Jewish propagandists about the Holocaust which has served the Jewish people so well.


Taken from Inconvenient History | A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry by Christoph M. Wieland



"THE ENEMY IS



LISTENING!"


What Did the British Intelligence Service Know about the Holocaust?

Christoph M. Wieland


In his book, The Ultra Secret,[1] published in 1974, author

Frederick W. Winterbotham revealed, for the first time,


that the British Intelligence Service was able to eavesdrop on

almost all German military radio communications from a very

early date, shortly after the outbreak of World War II.


As a captain in the Royal Air Force and officer of the Military

Intelligence Service, Winterbotham supervised the work of the

Government Code & Cipher School in Bletchley Park, where

cryptanalysts cracked the "Enigma" code used in German

cipher machines to scramble messages transmitted by the

German army, navy and air force.

 

Seven more years were fated to pass by before the public was

permitted to learn that Bletchley Park personnel were capable

of far more than simply reading written German military

messages. In 1981, cryptanalyst Francis H. Hinsley published


the second volume of his book
British Intelligence in the


Second World War
.[2] Hinsley's book revealed that the

British Intelligence Service also eavesdropped on radio signals

transmitted by the German police, SD and SS.

This enabled the British to obtain not only reliable information

on events behind the Russian Front, but on events in the

German concentration camps as well.

 

On 19 May 1997, the British government transferred the

decoded documents in Bletchley Park to the Public Records

Office in London, thereby making them accessible to the

public for research purposes.[3] Oddly, only a very few

Holocaust historians were interested in the information on the

concentration camps. The reason for this astonishing lack of

interest is presumably due to the following remark by author

Hinsley:

The messages from Auschwitz, the largest camp, with 20,000

inmates,[4] mention disease as the chief cause of death, but

also include references to executions by hanging and shooting.

The decoded messages contain no references to gassings.[5]

 

The present article is intended to summarize the information

obtained at Bletchley Park on events in Auschwitz

Concentration Camp. Despite Hinsley's unambiguous

statement, British Intelligence Service information continues

to give rise to a multiplicity of interpretations and speculation,

just as before. At the same time, the question of what the

British "knew about the Holocaust" always takes priority over

everything else.

 

As shown by the Bletchley Park documents, the commandant

of Auschwitz had to file a report every single day. With the

exception of Sunday, these messages consisted of daily reports

on population [Bestand], arrivals [Zugänge], and departures

[Abgänge] from the concentration camps. For over thirteen

months, from January 1942 to January 1943, the British

Intelligence Service followed up and decoded these reports

from Auschwitz Concentration Camp to the SS Head Business

Administration Office [SS-Wirtschafts-Verwaltungshauptamt]

in Oranienburg.

 

The decoded messages enabled the compilation of very exact

statistics. The radio messages from 28 October 1942 – taking

a single day at random – reveal, for example, that Auschwitz

Concentration Camp contained a total, all told, of 25,298

inmates: 18,754 men and 6,544 women; including 10,755 Jews,

8,822 Poles, 1,369 Russians and 1,578 Germans. It was also

learned that there were exactly 787 Zugänge and 168 Abgänge

on 28 July 1942; Zugänge referred to the arrival of new

inmates; Abgänge referred to deaths, executions, releases and

inmates transferred to other camps.

 

These daily radio messages also contained additional

information related to Auschwitz. Thus, it was reported, for

example, that Jewish watchmakers were being transferred to

Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp; that Polish workers

could only be sent elsewhere [verschickt] after release from

quarantine; that British POWs were considered to be urgently

needed to work as kapos; and that efforts were being made to

locate a successor to the then-acting garrison doctor by

September 1942.

 

With regard to the Holocaust, the Abgänge were naturally of

particular interest. In actual fact, the monthly number of

Abgänge in the year 1942 fluctuated in an unusual manner.

While the number of Abgänge normally amounted to

approximately 2,000 inmates per month, there was a great

increase in these figures in July, August, September and

October. For example, 8,352 Abgänge were reported for the

month of August 1942.

 

As is readily apparent from the radio messages, this unusually

high number of Abgänge was due to a typhus epidemic at

Auschwitz.[6] Typhus, sometimes also known as “camp

fever” is, as is well known, transmitted by fleas and lice;

under poor hygienic circumstances it will inevitably appear in

almost any such  camp. According to the decoded radio

messages, it took the Auschwitz authorities approximately

four months to bring the epidemic under control. The

numbers only fell back down to the average figure of

approximately 2,000 Abgänge per month in November and

December 1942.

 

Auschwitz Concentration Camp, as mentioned above, had

requested a successor to their current on-duty garrison

physician in August 1942. This successor, who took over in his

official capacity on 6 September 1942, was Dr. Eduard

Wirths. In his notes, Wirths left a vivid report on conditions in

Auschwitz at that time:[7]

 

I found inconceivable inmate conditions. There was no running

water, no working toilets, no way to bathe. The barracks

lodging the prisoners were overfilled and there was a shortage

of beds. There were masses of lice all over the floors, clothing

and inmates' bodies. The walls were black with fleas. The

condition of the inmates was simply unbelievable, emaciated to

their very bones, devoured by vermin, with dead bodies lying

around between living inmates. Hundreds of dying inmates

were taken away, but sometimes they lay around among the

living for days.

 

It was obvious that the epidemic would spread to the guard

personnel as well. The Bletchley Park intercepts reported, for

example, that, on 4 September

“the entire camp was subjected

to quarantine”[8]  and “in October, 11 SS-Men were

hospitalized with suspected typhus.”[9]

 

Wirths succeeded temporarily in bringing the epidemic under

control by building additional barracks, infirmaries, installing

additional drains and water pipes, latrines and targeted use of

measures intended to combat infection:

 

Through the chamber of physicians [Ärztekammer], we applied

or permission to distribute white bread and milk. Instead of

polluted drinking water, I took care to distribute drinks such as

coffee and tea. I ordered the organization of field kitchens for

working inmates, due to the great distances between the

worksites and their living quarters and commissaries, which

meant that otherwise the workers would get no hot food all day.

When the construction of field kitchens was impracticable, I

had hot food delivered to the work sites by vehicle. I requested

permission to allow recovering inmates to gather wild

vegetables, medicinal herbs. At the same time, I wanted Jewish

women confined by the camp administration to be able to move

about in the open. I requested rest for physically weakened

inmates, even the construction of entire rest departments.[10]

 

Dr. Wirths’s struggle against the epidemics must have been a

real labor of Sisyphus. Obviously, fresh cases of typhus

arrived in the camp with each new rail transport. Thus, on 28

January 1943, Bletchley Park issued a report to the effect that


"there were 36 cases of typhus among the inmates arriving on

22 January.”[11]

 

In the summer of 1942, the first Polish and Jewish reports

appeared [12] alleging the commission of mass murder on an

industrial scale in Auschwitz. According to these reports,

2,000 inmates were being killed in gas chambers every day.

Since the number of Abgänge reported amounted to

approximately 2,000 inmates per month, and not 2,000

inmates per day, the British Intelligence Service rejected these

reports as war propaganda. Thus, the president of the British

Joint Intelligence Committee, Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, on

27 August 1943, wrote that the reports from Poles and Jews

were devoid of all basis in fact:[13]

 

The allegations of mass executions in gas chambers are

reminiscent of the atrocity stories from the last war, according

to which the Germans were processing corpses into fat – a

grotesque lie, which was immediately unmasked as pure

propaganda.


The first historian ever permitted to examine the deciphered

messages from Bletchley Park was Richard Breitman. In his

book,

Official Secrets: What the Nazis Planned, What the British and

Americans Knew,[14] published in 1998, Breitman made

serious accusations against the Allies. As indicated in the

translation back to English of the German translation of his

book – State Secrets: Nazi Crimes Tolerated by the Allies

[Staatsgeheimnisse: Die Verbrechen der Nazis – von den

Alliierten toleriert], he accuses the British and Americans of

having known about the Holocaust from the very beginning,

but of deliberately concealing this information. In particular,

he accused Cavendish-Bentinck of rejecting the “Information

from Polish and Jewish sources as invented.”

[15] This accusation is, however, entirely unjustified. Why

should Cavendish-Bentinck have accorded credibility to

unreliable reports when he was in possession of reliable radio

messages from Auschwitz itself?

 

That Cavendish-Bentinck rejected the credibility of reports

from Polish and Jewish underground sources is all the more

understandable when one reads some of the documents cited

by Breitman. Thus, for example, he reports that “a Polish

underground courier who had succeeded in escaping to

London”

had made the following statements on Auschwitz

Concentration Camp:[16]

 

I lived a few weeks in Auschwitz.[…] Based on the information

which I gathered, together with my own observations, I can

assure you that the Germans used the following killing

methods.

(A) Gas chambers: the victims were forced naked into the

chambers, where they suffocated.

(B) Electrical chambers: these chambers had metal walls. The

victims were driven inside and then killed by high-voltage

electrical current.

(C) The so-called pneumatic hammer system: a pneumatic

hammer designed to kill by means of pneumatic pressure.

Is it really so remarkable that Cavendish-Bentinck considered

such reports unworthy of belief? Obviously not. Any similar

report would be immediately rejected as false, even today.

 

But there is more: According to information provided by “a

Polish woman with the code name Wanda,”

"98% of all arrivals at Auschwitz were gassed.”[17]

 

Auschwitz was a forced-labor camp suffering from a severe

shortage of manpower, as the officials at Bletchley Park well

knew. Why should Cavendish-Bentinck lend the slightest

credence to the allegation that 98% of all inmates were gassed

immediately after their arrival?

 

The British Intelligence Service had every reason to consider

the decoded radio messages of the SS the most reliable source

of information on events in Auschwitz. In view of the available

data, it was, therefore, furthermore assumed that the local

mortality rates amounted to approximately 2,000 per month,

instead of 2,000 per day. According to the figures reported by

the SS, there were exactly 52,996 Abgänge in the entire year of

1942. The unusually high number is, as stated above,

attributable to the series of typhus epidemics which can easily

be proven to have broken out in the late summer of 1942. If

there had been 2,000 deaths per day in 1942, the number of

Abgänge would have amounted to at least 730,000.


The figures decoded in Bletchley Park obviously caused

confusion among historians. The official number of Auschwitz

victims amounts, as is well known, to 1 million. But how is it

possible to arrive at such a high figure based on the SS radio

messages deciphered by the British Intelligence Service?

 

In an attempt to shore up the official figure of Auschwitz

victims, Breitman claims that the number of actual victims

were subject to particularly severe measures of official

censorship and confidentiality when reported by radio:[18]

 

Strict secrecy was still maintained within the SS, regardless of

Enigma. Top secret information was still transmitted by courier

only.

 

This allegation is really not very convincing. Why should the

mass gassings at Auschwitz not be reported through Enigma

when the mass shootings on the Eastern Front were reported

through Enigma, i.e., in precisely the same way? Regardless of

whether it was a matter of mass executions in Riga, Minsk or

Kiev – oddly, Breitman's book constantly proves its points

based on the reports from Bletchley Park, which the author

obviously considers reliable.

 

Just how arbitrary the above allegation by Breitman really is,

is made clear, last but not least of all, by the fact that the

Germans entrusted Enigma with information of crucial, even

decisive, information on their maneuvers, such as the current

position of U-boats or the exact dates involved in future

German air attacks.

 

Obviously less than completely convinced by his own

arguments, Breitman resorts, only a few pages further on, to

another explanation. Here, he states:[19]

 

The statistics only include inmates who were registered in the

Auschwitz camps.[…] The statistics nevertheless lack all

mention of Jews who were selected for the gas chambers

immediately after their arrival.

 

What is the evidence for this assumption?

As Breitman himself had already stated, “Himmler wanted to

know how many inmates were released, and how many died, in

each.”[20] But if Himmler ordered the camps to report the

number of deaths, why should the commandant of Auschwitz

withhold this same number? Breitman's assumption appears

to be a purely ad hoc hypothesis intended simply to enable the

writer to continue clinging to the official number of victims at

Auschwitz.

 

Another book on Bletchley Park and the Holocaust was

published in 2004. Historian Nicholas Terry, in Yad Vashem


Studies,
 published an article entitled “Conflicting Signals,”[21]

defended the British Intelligence Service against Richard

Breitman's accusations: the British Intelligence Service had, in

fact, according to him, discovered no clear evidence of

extermination of Jews based on radio messages deciphered at

Bletchley Park.

 

First of all, Terry straightens out a misunderstanding on

Breitman's part. Of course, an order was, in fact, actually

issued on 13 September 1941 prohibiting all further reporting

of victim numbers by radio, but, rather, ordering that all such

figures be communicated by courier only; but this order only

applied to the three Higher SS and Police Leaders

(HSSPF).[22]

 

On 24 August 1941, Winston Churchill had made the mistake,

in a radio address, of denouncing the mass shootings carried

out behind the Russian front by the German Ordnungspolizei

[NS regular police].[23] Churchill's remarks remained, of

course, very vague, but aroused the suspicion on the part of

the head of the German Ordnungspolizei, Kurt Daluege, that

the British had been eavesdropping on German radio reports.

Daluege therefore issued an order to the heads of the

Ordnungspolizei, deciphered by the British, prohibiting the

mention, for the time being, of victim numbers by radio. In

response to a suggestion by SS-Obergruppenführer Friedrich

Jeckeln, the victim figures were not, however, deleted, but,

rather, merely camouflaged, i.e., henceforth reported under

the heading of "Action under the Customs of War."[24] 


The decisive point is that the order issued by Daluege was

addressed to the HSSPF, not the SS. The Auschwitz

Commandant's office therefore continued to report its

Abgänge on a regular basis. On 28 January 1943, Bletchley

Park even reported that the Oranienburg office issued an

order to compile detailed statistics and to report the exact

numbers of deceased inmates and new arrivals.[25]


 

Like Richard Breitman, Nicholas Terry also alleges that the

people murdered immediately after their arrival were not

included in the lists of Abgänge because they were never

registered, but were, instead, taken straight to the gas

chambers.[26] This is, of course, entirely conceivable. But

without a single document expressly ordering that inmates

murdered in gas chambers directly after their arrival should

not be reported, the assumption remains merely an ad hoc

hypothesis.

 

That this ad hoc hypothesis is merely a far-fetched assumption

is easily demonstrated by reference to a very few simple

considerations. How was the Reichsführer SS supposed to

know how the “Final Solution to the Jewish Question" was

progressing unless the commandant of Auschwitz regularly

reported the fate of each individual incoming transport? It

goes without saying that Himmler had to be informed of the

numbers of inmates arriving at Auschwitz, being transferred

to other concentration camps or being killed in the gas

chambers. The SS Head Business Administration Office

[SS-Wirtschaft-Verwaltungshauptamt] must have insisted upon

exact statistics as well. Since it was responsible for all

concentration camps, it would have needed to be informed, not

only of the number of able-bodied, working inmates, but the

number of unregistered, non-able-bodied inmates as well, even

if only to justify the quantities of Zyklon B requested for the

gas chambers as well as for the requested quantities of coke

for the crematoria.


Altogether, it would be a gross underestimation of German

bureaucracy to assume that exact records were not kept of

every procedure.

 

At Auschwitz, not a single birth, death, delousing, release,

punishment, execution, case of illness or cremation could occur

without being reported to Agency Group [Amtsgruppe] D of

the SS-WVHA in Oranienburg by the camp commandant's

office.

 

Finally, Jürgen Graf and Carlo Mattogno have discovered

numerous documents in the Moscow archives illustrating not

only the extent of German bureaucracy, but the unlikelihood

of any Holocaust as well. As one example, I would like to cite

the report from Dr. Horst Fischer to Dr. Eduard Wirths. In a

letter dated 13 April 1943, the camp physician Dr. Fischer at

Buna wrote to the garrison physician Dr. Wirths informing

him of the arrival of 658 inmates at Auschwitz Camp. Of these

658 inmates, 109, after a thorough medical examination, were

found to be unable to work. And of these 109 non-able-bodied

inmates, 25 were sent to one of the rest and recovery wards at

Buna, 33 were sent to the inmate infirmary at Buna, and 51

were transferred to the much better-equipped inmate hospital

at Auschwitz I.

 

To sum up, the following facts may be considered established:

The messages deciphered at Bletchley Park undoubtedly

constitute one of the most reliable sources on the course of

events during the Second World War. They provide

information on undertakings of the German army, navy, and

air force. They provide an insight into the events occurring

behind the Russian front and the conditions in the

concentration camps. Since the reports from Auschwitz

contain no information on mass killings, the question of

whether the British Intelligence Service "knew about the

Holocaust," can be answered with a single word: "No!"[27]

 

In view of the fact that the messages from Auschwitz contain

no mention of gas chambers or mass murders, the real

question is: what was there really for anybody to "know"

about? In other words: was there any Holocaust at all?


Regardless of the general belief that hardly any historical

event has ever been so thoroughly "proven," one must, once

again, expressly point out that, until the present, not one single

material or documentary proof for the reality of any mass

killings in gas chambers has ever been found. The only thing

that exists, at most, is mutually contradictory "eyewitness

testimonies" and "confessions," which can, at least in the

latter case, easily be shown to have been given under duress.

 

The most reliable documents on Auschwitz – the Sterbebücher

von Auschwitz,[28] the Kommandanturbefehle von

Auschwitz[29]  and the "radio messages from Auschwitz,

deciphered by the Allies”[30]  – contain not the slightest

reference to mass killings by means of toxic gas. This is in

addition to the fact that the number of victims reported by the

British Intelligence Service largely coincide with the numbers


of victims reported in the Auschwitz
"Death Books."

 

As already mentioned, Auschwitz Concentration Camp

reported a total of 52,996 Abgänge for the year 1942 as a

whole. According to the "Death Books," there are supposed to

have been a total of 36,958 deaths at Auschwitz in 1942. The

fact that the numbers of Abgänge is greater than the number

of deaths is easily explained, since the term Abgänge includes,

as mentioned above, not only natural deaths and victims of

execution, but also inmates who had been released or

transferred elsewhere. It is therefore entirely conceivable that

the number of 36,958 deaths given in the "Death Books" for

the year 1942 is quite correct. The existing discrepancy of

16,038 could reflect the number of inmates transferred to

other camps or released. Pending the discovery of a document

unambiguously proving the gassing of thousands of human

beings at Auschwitz by Zyklon B, we are perfectly justified in

casting doubt upon the official version of the "Holocaust."


Notes:

Translated from German by Carlos W. Porter

[1]

Frederick W. Winterbotham, The Ultra Secret (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1974).

[2]

Francis H. Hinsley British Intelligence in the Second World War. Volume II: Its Influence on Strategy and Operations (London: Stationary Books, 1981).

[3]

BBC Holocaust Documents Released. 20 May 1997. Online: http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/holocaust/5114.shtml

[4]

The number of prisoners at Auschwitz grew continuously over the years. By 22 August 1944 the number of prisoners had grown to 104,891.

[5]

Francis H. Hinsley, op. cit., p. 673.

[6]

Bletchley Park Summary Reports ZIP/OS1 of 21 August 1942.

[7]

Ulrich Völklein, Dr. med. Eduard Wirths: Ein Arzt in Auschwitz. Eine Quellenedition (Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 2005), p. 40.

[8]

Bletchley Park Summary Reports ZIP/OS2 of 27 September 1942.

[9]

Bletchley Park Summary Reports ZIP/OS3 of 29 October 1942.

[10]

Ulrich Völklein, op. cit., S. 42.

[11]

Bletchley Park Summary Reports ZIP/OS6 of 28 January 1943.

[12]

The first report of extermination of Jews was presented in the so-called “Riegner Telegram” of 8 August 1942. On 8 August 1942 the bureau chief of the Jewish World Congress in Geneva wrote to the governments in London and Washington that it had been decided in Berlin to “exterminate with one blow” all deported Jews.

[13]

Bletchley Park PRO FO 371/34551 of 27 August 1943.

[14]

Richard Breitman, Official Secrets: What the Nazis Planned, What the British and Americans Knew (New York: Hill & Wang, 1998). All citations from this book are taken from the German translation.: Richard Breitman, Staatsgeheimnisse: Die Verbrechen der Nazis – von den Alliierten toleriert (Munich: Goldmann, 2001).

[15]

Ibid, p. 162.

[16]

Ibid, p. 160.

[17]

Ibid, p. 164.

[18]

Ibid, p. 154.

[19]

Ibid, p. 157.

[20]

Ibid, p. 156.

[21]

Nicholas Terry, “Conflicting Signals: British Intelligence on the 'Final Solution' through Radio Intercepts and Other Sources.” Yad Vashem Studies 32: 351-396, 2004.

[22]

Ibid, pp. 365f.

[23]

Ibid, p. 360.

[24]

Ibid, p. 366.

[25]

Bletchley Park Summary Reports ZIP/OS6 of 28 January 1942.

[26]

Terry, op. cit., p. 388.

[27]

Or better stated: the radio communications deciphered at Bletchley Park contain only information regarding mass shootings behind the front, but not regarding mass gassings at Auschwitz (Oder behutsamer formuliert: Die in Bletchley Park entschlüsselten Funksprüche enthalten nur Informationen zu Masserschießungen hinter der Front, nicht aber zu Massenvergasungen in Auschwitz.)

[28]

Staatliches Museum Auschwitz, Sterbebücher von Auschwitz (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995).

[29]

Norbert Frei (ed.), Darstellungen und Quellen zur Geschichte von Auschwitz: Standort- und Kommandanturbefehle des Konzentrationslagers Auschwitz 1940 – 1945 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000).

[30]

David Bankier (Ed.), Secret Intelligence and the Holocaust. Collected Essays from the Colloquium at the City University of New York (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 2006).

Author(s):

Christoph M. Wieland


Title:

"The Enemy Is Listening!"


Sources:

Inconvenient History, 8(1) 2016


Dates:

published: 2016-02-18, first posted: 2016-03-15 01:32:19






You can read further at The Problem
You can read further at Guide to "Checks and Balances"
You can read further at The Solution
Write us at letters@thechristiansolution.com



Article located at:
http://www.thechristiansolution.com/doc2022/1054_Holofake.html


Last Hope for America
Christian Libertarian: Harmonious Union
of
Church and State


The Christian Solution ©             First Release: March 15, 2008