---

Let me ask you a question media.

Why is it that you hypocritically insist upon a First Amendment Separation of Christian Church and State, but you utterly fail to have the same guidelines for a First Amendment Separation of YOUR Speech and State?

Why do you instead passively allow an outright marriage of Media and State?

The answer naturally speaks for itself. A non-Christian Jewish media is not going to pluck the log out of their own eye when they get so much pleasure finding specs in the eyes of Christians.

So what of this marriage of Speech and State?

Isn't the founding ideal in our Constitution that the federal government does not report and control the national news across all the States? 

In that light, how can it be perfectly OK then for the journalist Jewish husband or journalist Jewish wife of the government to report and control the news?

We have talked before about the problems of the modern media. In constitutional days, a man could stand on a platform and shout as loud as he could. A tiny few could listen. Another man could arm a printing press and turn the crank as hard as he could, reaching a few thousand people. There were no microphones tp record speech, no cameras to record a picture, and certainly no camera to take video.

Today, a single NBC or a single CNN transmits its video and audio message through the thickest wall protecting your home to deliver national news 24-hours a day, 7 days a week to every single American.

That is the capability of powerful tyrannical propaganda.

That kind of unelected, unaccountable power cannot be allowed to exist for the good of this country.

Indeed, contrary to most Progressive concerns about a living Constitution, the First Amendment on speech is not at all what the Founders were faced with in their time and demands a re-evaluation.

The list below (by Ann Coulter?) proves there is no separation whatsoever between the federal government and the so-called Fourth Estate, whose self-appointed job is to be a watch-dog for the government and for what they want you to believe - for the good of the people. This list of newly-weds proves our Judeo-MSM are nothing more than sitting on the lap dogs of a federal Deep State, also ran by Judeo-Bureaucrats like Nadler, Schift, Schumer, Rosentein and others.

If any good can be said to come of this, is that their watch dog status only goes so far as watching out for the interests of Jews.

To their credit, Snopes.com jumped right on top of this story to rebut it. Well, not that they say any of the story was wrong, merely that the story is outdated because Obama is no longer President and so the person saying this is biased. Do not believe though that any of the liberal national media married into the top levels of the liberal federal bureaucracy at the time of Obama were or are now biased.

This judeo-press who is knowingly all over the so-called "Military-Industrial Complex conspiracy" and its supposed involved corruption, where the Secretary of Defense is hired from Lockheed, serves his time in government as oversight over Lockheed, and then returns to Lockheed afterwards, can see no evil of their own making.

To be fair, the Secretary of Defense works for the President and is paid by Congress, so a conspiracy of a Military-Industrial Complex would have to extend to a President who had served this nation's defense. And that would be...

•  President Trump? - Nope never served
  
•  Obama? -Haha, give me a break!
  
•  President Bush? - Weak, he was barely in the Reserves to escape service in Vietnam.
  
•  Clinton? Gotta be kidding! 
  
•  President Papa Bush?  - There, there is your conspiracy of a military-industrial complex. Oh, wait a minute. He was really an anti-American, One-Wold-Government puppet, who begged the UN for permission to use our military to go to war. Judeo-MSM had no problem with Papi Bush
•  President Reagan?  Nope sorry, only made movies about serving in the military.
  
•  President Jimmy Carter?  BINGO!  He was a navy nuclear submarine commandant.  But wait again. Didn't Jimmy Carter get ridiculed for screwing up the military-industrial complex? And a failed military raid to free our Iranian-held  hostages? So, No, not the peanut farmer.
  
•  President Ford?  Indeed; however, he held no real power after Nixon
•  President Nixon? Yes; but again, held so little power that he was able to be railroaded out of office by much ado about nothing.
•  President Johnson? Yes, Johnson served this country in WW2 and used our military in a cowardly way in a failed attempt to defend against the spread of communism in South Vietnam. He was the press's idea of a Military-Industrial Complex who had won the World War of Hitler, Mussolini and Hirohito, but was still fighting a cold war against the remaining Fascist communist government, that of Stalin. Yeh, you gotta hate those American veterans defending our country.
  

If the press is so WOKE to a fake Military-Industrial Complex, interesting then why are they so asleep to the real log in their own eyes?  (Getting this right for Snopes as Moseley was not the actual President of CNN) Where their own CNN V-I-C-E_President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton's Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

In YOUR company, when a manager is recently married or dating someone they are supposed to monitor,  such as a subordinate, then ethics requires someone to be reassigned.  But not in our virtue-signaling WOKE media, where the VP of CNN is supposed to monitor her own HUSBAND!!!

Yeh, bet we get some real muckraking scoups from CNN on that.  Of course I'm being facetious, even if it is deadly serious for our country's future.

Once again, the solution is for the States of the United States to convene an independent fact-checking commission and corruption watch dog of their own to guard against the national media taking over the national government. Much like the States join to enact the commercial codes.

CNN is owned by AT&T based in Texas. So where are you Texas?

The federal government is a creation of the States and the States are obliged to reign in their beast, least it gets out of hand.

Anyone against more checks and balances?  Or do you just want a fascist government?

The Judeo-MSM is not going to police itself. In fact, WORST -- they claim to be above the law.

Outside a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, extending the Bill of Rights to reverse impose the federal government control upon the States, the press only has an immunity from imposition of the federal government upon them, not an immunity preventing State government control of the nation-destroying fake news of a fake Judeo-media operating within their State.

Get a Constitutional Amendment through if necessary.
 

---