The Christian Solution
|Home Page About TCS Contact Us Document Library|
February 2018 AD
The Star Chamber was an English court of law which sat at the royal Palace of Westminster, from the late 15th century to the mid-17th century (c. 1641), and was composed of Privy Councillors and common-law judges, to supplement the judicial activities of the common-law and equity courts in civil and criminal matters.
The Star Chamber was originally established to ensure the fair enforcement of laws against socially and politically prominent people so powerful that ordinary courts would probably hesitate to convict them of their crimes.
However, it became synonymous with social and political oppression through the arbitrary use and abuse of the power it wielded.
- Wikipedia - Star Chamber
My how history repeats itself!!!
We are having our own problems enforcing laws in the courts against "socially and politically prominent people" -- but only on one side of the political spectrum -- Hillary, Obama, Comey, and so on.
The other political side is constantly attacked in the courts, i.e. conservatives.
Take for instance, the ordinary, lowly, federal judge who, knowingly even, grossly and arrogantly abused his judicial powers, by placing a stay on Trump ending DACA on March 5th by stating:
“The question before the court is thus not whether defendants could end the DACA program, BUT whether they offered legally adequate reasons for doing so,
“Based on its review of the record before it, the court concludes that defendants have not done so.”
-- wrote Judge Garaufis, a Clinton appointee to the court in New York.
--Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
The "defendant" in this case is President Trump whom he says did not offer a "legally adequate reason" for LEGALLY ending DACA.
(Trump could have ended DACA as fast as Obama illegally created it, but instead, he compassionately held off for months, allowing Congress time to debate and argue what Congress wanted to do about the illegal aliens, if anything.)
Of course, this judge himself CANNOT give a "legally adequate reason" for his ILLEGALLY forcing DACA to be extended.
The fascist judge "graciously" says Trump could perform his duties as President to all Americans, but only so long as he checks in with every one of the 600 federal judges and personally gives those judges a reason acceptable to each one of them for doing his duty as President.
Until all 600 judges are happy, our President will be restrained from doing his job.
My guess is that no reason would be acceptable to this particular judge.
Good God! We just had a Supreme Court decision saying that Trump is allowed to give an executive order on immigration.
The Checks and Balances on a federal judge who abuses his judicial powers is impeachment by the House of Representatives, followed by a trial in the Senate.
This is a case for all America to see.
Easy breezy to impeach this Judge abusing his oath to uphold the Constitution.
The House can and should bring immediate impeachment proceedings against this rogue judge and the Senate should impeach this criminal judge.
No, I do painfully understand Congress will do no such thing.
But What About FISA Judges?
But what about those FISA judges?
These are secret courts; classified courts we are told. National security courts to protect us.
We cannot see what they are doing, or saying, or even who the judge of the case is, for our own good you know.
Except, these FISA Courts abused their authority in conspiring, either wittingly or not, to deprive the American people of the President they elected into office.
What part of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allows for a Super-Watergate-style burglary of Trump Tower to help the campaign of Obama's ally, Hillary Clinton?
The American people would NEVER had known the abuse had the Democrats not been so insistent in having "investigations" of their manufactured fraud against America.
Thank God for their stupidity!
But what about Congress?
How can ordinary members of Congress be apprised of "Classified", "Top Secret", "National Security" illegal and treasonous claptrap going on in the FISA court if they have no security clearance "right to know"?
How does a FISA judge ever get impeached in a Constitutional impeachment?
Since we cannot even seem to impeach a judge who is in our face abusing the Constitution, how so can we impeach a judge we don't even know the name of who is abusing his constitutional authority which we know nothing about?
How do Americans hold their elected officials to the fire to impeach these abusive judges if they never know about these ghost judges?
Where's the transparency?
Just like England discovered centuries ago, how do you hold accountable a STAR CHAMBER gone berserk?
Article located at:
Last Hope for America
Christian Libertarian: Harmonious Union
Church and State
Must Read Classics
"Checks and Balances"
History of the World
The Christian Solution © First Release: March 15, 2008