NATO

January 2018 AD

NATO
UN's Police Force

Just as the Federal Reserve was sold to the American people as a means to smooth out the ripples of the business cycle, so too was the United Nations sold as a means of averting future wars.

In the UN-creating Kumbaya days following the "Second" "War to end all Wars", Islam was being sold to American dupes as the "religion of peace", whom we would want to join with in a United Nations; itself sold to American dupes as the global "government of peace".

How could America refuse such an offer?

Now, to be sure, to insure peace, you have to have "peacekeepers". And that is exactly why NATO was created.

I never knew NATO was under the UN; did you?

But now everything else becomes clearer.

SEATO was another "peacekeeping" division of the UN we also signed up to help defend.

While it's apparent now that the WARSAW Pact countries had formed their own UN affiliated "peacekeepers".

Seems obvious now that the entire Cold War was a fiction to justify the United Nation's entire array of divisional or regional "Peacekeepers".

Funny thing is that you don't need "Peacekeepers" unless you don't have peace; and so, if you don't have peace, then why would you need a UN to settle disputes peacefully?

The scare quotes around the word "peacekeepers" is because they are far from keepers of peace. They are an evil military force of great strength which can and will crush any opposition. That is indeed scary!!!

Like any government, the United Nations has had to continually justify its existence.

With the Cold War fakery dissolved, today, UN justifies that all nations have to join together to defend themselves from "stateless" actors; such as some Osama baddie holed up in a cave in Afghanistan directing terrorism across the globe.

This has now become the UN justification for a world-wide police force.

David Koresh in Waco Texas was a man any Waco policeman and certainly a single Texas Ranger could have handled at a local level; and yet, Bill Clinton treated David Koresh as if he were Osama Bin Laden himself holed up in Afghanistan directing terrorist attacks against distant shores.

Was WACO then really a UN show of force within the United States against Christians thinking of rebelling against the New World Order?

Seems obvious to me that the United Nations has not been any more successful in keeping the peace than the League of Nations which preceded it, nor has it been more successful in smoothing out conflicts among nations than the Fed has been in smoothing out the business cycle between business and customer and wage earner.

In fact, America has been in more UN "peacekeeping" wars, for far longer, with far less results, than in all our other wars combined.

The first UN Peacekeeping "police action" (and the only one the UN has had the courage to brag about), was the Korean War.

The United States found itself on the brink of nuclear war with China because of North Korea? -- seems we cannot thank the United Nations enough for saving the world from nuclear war (sarcasm).

Oh, by the way, today, 70-years later, North Korea itself now threatens America with nuclear weapons? Well, 70 years later you can always count on a politician to not only not have resolved a single problem, but to have made the problem worst.

Why are we are still looking to the United Nations for squaring away this North Korean mess for us.

SEATO obligations brought us into the Vietnam War as a second "police action", again not requiring a Declaration of War from Congress. But this time, no politician said it was an UN police action.

When President George HW Bush wanted to invade Iraq, many thought it strange that he did not present his facts to Congress for them to decide, for them to declare war; but instead, went straight to the United Nations to obtain their blessing.

Bush Sr. stopped when he reached the Iraqi border because the UN only gave him permission to expel Saddam from Kuwait. Hr knew who his boss really was and it was not the American people.

Later, Bush's son, President George W. Bush was given permission by the UN to completely wipe out Saddam. Now this is critical. The UN did not direct its "peacekeepers" to protect the Christians of Iraq. UN "peacekeepers" are only for keeping the peace for others.

So mission creep led the UN under Obama to arm blood curling ISIS madmen to overthrow the defenders of Christians in Syria, Assad. Not enough that Christians in Iraq be massacred, but the UN wanted Syrian Christians massacred as well.

Bill Clinton invoked the United Nations NATO force to bomb Serbian Christians to defend Kosovo Muslims, after the Muslims had gone on a Serbia police beheading spree.

Once again, the UN was murdering Christians, not defending them from vicious bloodthirsty Muslims.

The UN and NATO are no friends to fellow American citizens and Christians such as David Koresh, nor to fellow Christians in other lands such as Serbian, Iraqi or Syrian Christians, nor to America itself with nuclear weapons threatening from North Korea.

With the Muslim invasions of Christian Europe, when will NATO honestly believe its duty has finally been invoked to "safeguard the freedom, common heritage, and civilization of their [European] peoples"? How does any of this barbaric invasion of non-European, non-Christian mobs into Europe "promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area?"

NATO Preamble
The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments.

They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area.

Honestly, the world needs Peacekeepers to defend us from the peacekeepers.

Blacks in Africa and the Caribbean seem relatively safe from UN soldiers, but in white Christian Serbia, not so much.

There are documented 800 cases of sexual abuse by the United Nations against Serbian Christians, 70 murders of Christians and 100 cases of extortion or theft against Christians. All to protect Muslims. Is that what America has signed up for?

Given the above history of anti-Christian UN activities, this should come as no surprise.

History of Sexual abuse, Murder and Extortion by UN "Peacekeepers"

UN Peacekeeper rapists

The old motto still stands higher than ever...

Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US.


	The North Atlantic Treaty Washington D.C. - 4 April 1949 04 Apr. 1949 - \| Last updated: 21 Mar. 2016 15:09 The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments. They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area. They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defence and for the preservation of peace and security. They therefore agree to this NorthAtlantic Treaty : Article 1 The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations. Article 2 The Parties will contribute toward the further development of peaceful and friendly international relations by strengthening their free institutions, by bringing about a better understanding of the principles upon which these institutions are founded, and by promoting conditions of stability and well-being. They will seek to eliminate conflict in their international economic policies and will encourage economic collaboration between any or all of them. Article 3 In order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack. Article 4 The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened. Article 5 The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security . Article 6 1 For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack: ⦁ on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer; ⦁ on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer. Article 7 This Treaty does not affect, and shall not be interpreted as affecting in any way the rights and obligations under the Charter of the Parties which are members of the United Nations, or the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security. Article 8 Each Party declares that none of the international engagements now in force between it and any other of the Parties or any third State is in conflict with the provisions of this Treaty, and undertakes not to enter into any international engagement in conflict with this Treaty. Article 9 The Parties hereby establish a Council, on which each of them shall be represented, to consider matters concerning the implementation of this Treaty. The Council shall be so organised as to be able to meet promptly at any time. The Council shall set up such subsidiary bodies as may be necessary; in particular it shall establish immediately a defence committee which shall recommend measures for the implementation of Articles 3 and 5. Article 10 The Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty. Any State so invited may become a Party to the Treaty by depositing its instrument of accession with the Government of the United States of America. The Government of the United States of America will inform each of the Parties of the deposit of each such instrument of accession. Article 11 This Treaty shall be ratified and its provisions carried out by the Parties in accordance with their respective constitutional processes. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited as soon as possible with the Government of the United States of America, which will notify all the other signatories of each deposit. The Treaty shall enter into force between the States which have ratified it as soon as the ratifications of the majority of the signatories, including the ratifications of Belgium, Canada, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States, have been deposited and shall come into effect with respect to other States on the date of the deposit of their ratifications. (3) Article 12 After the Treaty has been in force for ten years, or at any time thereafter, the Parties shall, if any of them so requests, consult together for the purpose of reviewing the Treaty, having regard for the factors then affecting peace and security in the North Atlantic area, including the development of universal as well as regional arrangements under the Charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international peace and security. Article 13 After the Treaty has been in force for twenty years, any Party may cease to be a Party one year after its notice of denunciation has been given to the Government of the United States of America, which will inform the Governments of the other Parties of the deposit of each notice of denunciation. Article 14 This Treaty, of which the English and French texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America. Duly certified copies will be transmitted by that Government to the Governments of other signatories. 1. The definition of the territories to which Article 5 applies was revised by Article 2 of the Protocol to the North Atlantic Treaty on the accession of Greece and Turkey signed on 22 October 1951. 2. On January 16, 1963, the North Atlantic Council noted that insofar as the former Algerian Departments of France were concerned, the relevant clauses of this Treaty had become inapplicable as from July 3, 1962. 3. The Treaty came into force on 24 August 1949, after the deposition of the ratifications of all signatory states.

You can read further at	The Problem
You can read further at	Guide to "Checks and Balances"
You can read further at	The Solution
Write us at	letters@thechristiansolution.com

Article located at:
http://www.thechristiansolution.com/doc2018/853_NATO.html

The Christian Solution