If you are just now realizing that your news is fake and has been
for the last 100 years, would it surprise you to know the history you
learned in public schools is just as fake.
Take the Spanish Inquisition for instance.
Especially hated by Jews, because it was primarily directed against
those Jews who falsely portrayed themselves to be Christian and thus
potentially allowing them to help Muslims retake Spain again, as the
Jews had conspired and colluded with Muslim invaders to take Spain 800
Catholics in Britain and Germany were being converted by Jews into
pseudo Christians of a Judas persuasion. All fire and brimstone,
and little love of Jesus.
They needed the Jewish fake history of the Inquisition, to help them
justify their hatred of Catholics at the time.
Time has not corrected this Fake History. However, we have covered all
this before in:
America's legal system
Now, a reader has pointed out to me the excellent 1994 show BBC has
created entitled "
The grandson of Ferdinand and Isabella was leader of not only Spain but
of the Holy Roman Empire, so determined as he to recreate the vast
Christian domains of old.
The decisive military Battle of Muhlberg was won by this leader,
Charles V in 1547 AD in trying to prevent to split of Christianity into
Catholic and Protestant halves.
However, what Protestants could not win on the battlefield, Jews, with
the newly invented printing press, helped Judas-based Protestants win
the propaganda wars.
The Gutenberg printing press of the late 1430's had spread to 2,500
European cities by 1500 AD.
The Yellow-Journalism, Judas-based, Jewish-led, propaganda war against
Catholic Europe began the year following the Battle of Muhlberg in
1547, but it needed a focus and that focus would be the Jew's favorite
hate, the Spanish Inquisition, the institution specifically created to
uphold the Catholic faith and especially created to uphold that faith
from corruption by Jews.
During the supreme height of Spanish superpower status, under King
Philip II, the first real trash against the Inquisition was written in
1567, solidifying the Black Legend.
While this propaganda piece against Christians in Spain was being
handed out to everyone in sight, Englishmen I suppose were forgetting
that an Englishman could be executed for destroying shrubs in public
gardens, or that several of their own queens was beheaded by a kangaroo
court appointed by their very own King Henry VIII. If you
returned to Germany from banishment, you could have your eyes gouged
out. In France, you could be disemboweled for sheep stealing.
It was a relative time for sure, but surely in such a time, lying
to God about your faith could be expected to have some dire
consequences, greater than destroying a bush or stealing a sheep.
Guess Christians, like whites and men are held to a higher standard --
The power of propaganda is to make people believe Christian churchmen
are the sole purveyors of torture, even though the Inquisitors in fact
rarely tortured, while other facts are ignored, as in the King of
England at the time having people who challenged his rule as both King
of England and Pope of the Anglican Church routinely drawn and
quartered, as depicted in the movie Braveheart. The Tower of London was
not a lookout for sightseers you know.
In fact, the Inquisition was performed by university trained men who
looked for facts to support the findings -- almost an enlightenment
practice, compared to 300 years of Protestants convicting women of
witchcraft on what could be no grounds whatsoever, as there is no such
thing as witchcraft.
The Inquisition burned heretics at the stakes, but no witches.
Spain reached the height of superpower status under King Charles V's
son Philip II. The Black Legend of the Inquisition would now be
directed against Philip. King Henry VIII was more barbaric than Philip
II, but Henry's image had to be cleaned up as the leader of the
Protestant Reformation, just as the image of Bill Clinton and Barack
Obama is cleaned up by Jewish MSM today, while everything George W Bush
and Donald Trump does is vilified.
Philip's son was more tolerant toward Protestantism than his father and
conveniently dies one year after the publishing of the Black
Legend, which plays into the hands of propagandists. This part of the
Black Legend was that the father had his own son killed to prevent
Spain becoming Protestant.
Per the story, King Philip turns to the Grand Inquisitor to absolve him
of killing his son, wherein the Grand Inquisitor intones that the son
is just as great a sacrifice for Christianity as was Christ's
sacrifice. All a myth, but storytellers get to embellish the facts as
they see them, and Jewish publishers make sure you never forget to made
Don Carlos made into an Opra by Giuseppe Verdi: This play marks [Friedrich]
Schiller's entrée into historical drama. Very loosely based on the
events surrounding the real Don Carlos of Spain, Schiller's
Don Carlos is another republican figure—he attempts to free Flanders
from the despotic grip of his father, King Phillip. The Marquis Posa's famous
speech to the king proclaims Schiller's belief in personal freedom and
had to burn heretics at the stake
Catholic Kings had no need to do so
All defamation needs to be ratcheted up by the Jewish press much as the
drip-by-drip accusations against white middle class Americans is
ratcheted up by complete fabrications in the name of entertainment like
The Handmaid's Tale, and two years after Don Carlos's death, a forgery
of what was portrayed to be a document from the Inquisition was
published falsely saying that the Inquisition was about to
commit genocide against entire populations of Protestants.
Never happened of course, but looking toward England's genocide against
Catholic Ireland, English Protestants would hardly be in a position to
throw the first stones, if the supposed Spanish genocide were to have
ever happened. Remember, it was Queen Elizabeth who was knighting
Pirate Francis Drake, making him Sir Francis Drake. Stealing gold from
Spanish gold ships being such a Christian virtue you know, worthy
of the Queen's blessing.
Spain had the cleanest reputation for killing heretics than any Western
European country, but is the only one vilified for doing so.
No more than 3-5 thousand people over the 350 year history of the
Inquisition. The estimation for the burning of just witches in the rest
of Europe was 150,000 during the same time frame.
How many more as heretics?
You see, it makes perfect sense.
It is far easier for a Catholic king to keep a Catholics in the
religion he was born and raised in, than it was for Protestant kings to
keep theirs Protestant who had been born and raised Catholic.
Just as we see today where Democrats project their sins, their evils,
their manipulations upon Republicans, so too did Protestant Kings had
to project against Catholic Kings.
Protestant Kings had to have massive heretic burnings in trying to keep
their subjects from reverting to their natural Catholic religion, while
Catholic kings had no such problem, since their subjects were born and
raised Catholic and remained Catholic. Catholic Kings had little
problem keeping their own people Catholic, but were the ones scorned
for burning at the stake of heretics.
Same goes for the torture preceding the burning at the stake.
Protestant Kings would use the Jewish propaganda to say the real
problem of religious torture and burning heretics lay with Catholic
Had King Ferdinand not gone after a teensy, tiny amount of Jews in
prominent positions in society, being heretics to Judaism, by falsely
pretending to be Christian conversos, no body at all would be talking
about the Spanish Inquisition today.
Only Jews keep this Fake History alive. As they do with the Fake
History of the Holocaust.