Our Constitution states that our Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, directly responsible for American foreign policy is not to take bribes of any kind from bloody Middle Eastern sheiks.

If Hillary flagrantly violates the Constitution by taking foreign bribes as an officer of the United States, can she also insist that she is owed the presidency because the Constitution says she obtained the most electoral votes?

Cannot have it both ways.

 
If a Muslim leader is found to be committing treason against his fellow Muslims, all Muslims feel they have a moral sense of duty to literally slit his OR HER throat.

How about half of all America who knows she violates the Constitution's prohibition against bribery by foreign countries, as she violates pretty much all the rest of the Constitution while in office.

Notwithstanding Hillary's incessant defenders who will state, "The Muslim King of Qatar could think of no better choice for his people's charity dollars than in the hands of an infidel American female leader of infidel America. Believe it!!!"

When will Americans stand firm and say: "NO!"


Do you see the interaction?

1.  Saudi Arabia and Qatar sell oil to us at blackmail prices.
2.  With their ultra unearned riches, the government buys our leaders, Hillary Clinton caught red-handed!!!
   
3.  Our bribed leaders sell them weapons, doubled under Hillary's watch
4.  The weapons and more money are sent by Saudi Arabia and Qatar to our enemy ISIS where Christian all over the Middle East are rounded up with the men's heads off'ed and the wives and daughters sexually enslaved
5.  Our bribed government officials lie to us that they are fighting and containing ISIS, but all you see are dead American soldiers.
6.   What our bribed government officials are really doing is arming what they lyingly call "rebels who only want to overthrow the government of Syria", but we find they are ISIS as well.
7.  Meanwhile, the real defender of Western Civilization, Vladimir Putin sends his army into the most flagrant stick-it-in-your-eye ISIS hold-out of Palmyra, where ISIS slits throats in front of the Roman temple. Within a few weeks, Russian troops are being entertained by a Russian orchestra in front of the same Roman temple.
8.  Not to forget, that our "bribed by Middle Eastern governments" Hillary has returned the bribed favor by advocating for massive Muslim immigration from those Middle Eastern countries.
   
9.  DO NOT DOUBT ME ON THIS!!! There is no way Hillary, all by herself, could have gotten away with any of this. Every corruption we see is all orchestrated under direction of Jews; in Hollywood, in Wall Street, in academia, in think tanks, and in the media.
   

In our civilized world, we have entrusted our political institutions to investigate the facts, en-panel a grand jury to review the facts, present an indictment, bring a trial before ones peers to decide guilty or innocence, while finally determining punishment.

America used to enforce her laws against treason with a firing squad.

Not anymore.

1.  Our laws on treason are violated with impunity for a mere bribe and washed down with Bill Mayer Judeo-mockery.

1.  Our country is sold out to our enemies and served up with a Saturday Night Live Judeo-skit.

1.  Our country is destroyed, while Seth Meyers, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert make Judeo-wise-cracks about the Americans who have lost everything. 

If all else fails against a totally unresponsive government, we Americans have a revolutionary spirit.

The American "second amendment" revolutionary spirit is upon us.

For 30 years, the Clintons and their Jewish entourage have escaped all justice.

It is time for WACO to come to the Clintons!!!

We are way past the "Lock Her Up" phase where Hillary would live out the next 4-8 years at a Club-Fed, after which a Democrat President would pardon her -- If Obama doesn't do it even before he leaves office.

Hillary's crony enablers are way past the "Lock Them Up" phase.

There is a massive Judeo crime ring operating all American institutions, even with deep tentacles within the Republican Party. They will not remove themselves from power without a fight.

We are at the guillotine stage in this country. 

Hillary's power base needs to be lined up one-by-one, justly awaiting their turn, delayed only for the head of the snake to be severed, before losing their own heads.

Hillary's bribed electorate had better keep quite as justice is rendered -- or we will come after them as well!!

SOURCE #1: Julian Assange says Trump 'won't be allowed to win' as he accuses Clinton donors of backing the rise of ISIS WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has claimed Donald Trump 'won't be allowed to win' next week's election during an interview to be broadcast on a pro-Kremlin TV station. The Australian computer hacker was speaking from inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London where he also accused Hillary Clinton of receiving donations from the same people funding ISIS. Assange said he was basing his claims on emails released last month by WikiLeaks. Speaking to Australian journalist John Pilger for Dartmouth Films, Assange claimed one of the leaked documents between showed a message sent by the then Secretary of State to John Podesta, who was an adviser to President Barack Obama. Assange said the email urged Obama to 'bring pressure' on the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar, 'which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups'. He described the email as the 'most important' in the entire collection. He claimed: 'All serious analysts know, and even the US government has agreed, that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS and funding ISIS, but the dodge has always been that it is some “rogue” princes using their oil money to do whatever they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that it is the government of Saudi Arabia, and the government of Qatar that have been funding ISIS.' Clinton has also been criticized over claims that the Clinton Foundation receives funding from Saudi and Qatari sources.  Later in the 25-minute interview, which will be broadcast on Russia Today, Assange claims next Tuesday's presidential election has been fixed in favour of Hillary Clinton. He added: 'My analysis is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that? Because he has had every establishment off his side. Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment. Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc. are all united behind Hillary Clinton. And the media as well. Media owners, and the journalists themselves.' Donald Trump has repeatedly said Tuesday's presidential election may be rigged, while providing scant evidence, and has urged supporters to keep an eye out for signs of voting fraud in Philadelphia and other heavily Democratic areas. Democrats worry that could encourage Trump supporters to harass minority voters in a state that could determine whether Trump or his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, wins the presidency. Voting-rights advocates said they are already receiving reports of harassment. Democrats have launched a legal blitz of their own in an attempt to shut down Trump's poll-watching efforts in Pennsylvania and three other battleground states, arguing in lawsuits that Republican monitoring efforts amount to 'vigilante voter intimidation' that violates federal law. Assange earlier denied he was a stooge for the Russian intelligence services, claiming they were not behind the damaging leaks to the Clinton campaign. He has been wanted by Swedish authorities since 2010 over rape allegations. He has been hiding the the Ecuadorian embassy in London over fears he will be extradited to the United States. He said: 'The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. 'Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That's false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source.' The first tranche of emails published by WikiLeaks claimed the Democratic party leadership actively favored Clinton over her rival for the nomination Bernie Sanders.  The Department of Homeland Security Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said last month they were 'confident' the Russian government was responsible for the leaks. But Russia has denied this and presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov said it was 'nonsense'. In an interview with veteran John Pilger on RT, Assange said: 'We have independently authenticated the emails. WikiLeaks has a decade-long, perfect record in the accurate authentication of leaked documents.'

SOURCE #2: Clinton's charity confirms it accepted $1million from Qatar to mark Bill's 65th birthday while she was at State Department and did not inform it after leaked email revealed the 'secret' gift The Clinton Foundation has confirmed it accepted a $1million gift from Qatar while Hillary Clinton was U.S. secretary of state without informing the State Department, even though she had promised to let the agency review new or significantly increased support from foreign governments. Qatari officials pledged the money in 2011 to mark the 65th birthday of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton's husband, and sought to meet the former U.S. president in person the following year to present him the check, according to an email from a foundation official to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta. The email, among thousands hacked from Podesta's account, was published last month by WikiLeaks. Clinton signed an ethics agreement governing her family's globe-straddling foundation in order to become secretary of state in 2009. The agreement was designed to increase transparency to avoid appearances that U.S. foreign policy could be swayed by wealthy donors. Clinton signed an ethics agreement governing her family's globe-straddling foundation in order to become secretary of state in 2009. The agreement was designed to increase transparency to avoid appearances that U.S. foreign policy could be swayed by wealthy donors. Foundation spokesman, Brian Cookstra, this week said that it accepted the $1million gift from Qatar, but this did not amount to a 'material increase' in the Gulf country's support for the charity Foundation spokesman, Brian Cookstra, this week said that it accepted the $1million gift from Qatar, but this did not amount to a 'material increase' in the Gulf country's support for the charity If a new foreign government wished to donate or if an existing foreign-government donor, such as Qatar, wanted to 'increase materially' its support of ongoing programs, Clinton promised that the State Department's ethics official would be notified and given a chance to raise any concerns. Clinton Foundation officials last month declined to confirm the Qatar donation. In response to additional questions, a foundation spokesman, Brian Cookstra, this week said that it accepted the $1million gift from Qatar, but this did not amount to a 'material increase' in the Gulf country's support for the charity. Cookstra declined to say whether Qatari officials received their requested meeting with Bill Clinton. Officials at Qatar's embassy in Washington and in its Council of Ministers in the capital, Doha, declined to discuss the donation. The State Department has said it has no record of the foundation submitting the Qatar gift for review, and that it was incumbent on the foundation to notify the department about donations that needed attention. A department spokeswoman did not respond to additional questions about the donation. According to the foundation's website, which lists donors in broad categories by cumulative amounts donated, Qatar's government has directly given a total of between $1million and $5million over the years. The Clinton Foundation has said it would no longer accept money from foreign governments if Clinton is elected president and would spin off those programs that are dependent on foreign governments. Foundation officials told Reuters last year that they did not always comply with central provisions of the agreement with President Barack Obama's administration, blaming oversights in some cases. At least eight other countries besides Qatar gave new or increased funding to the foundation, in most cases to fund its health project, without the State Department being informed, according to foundation and agency records. They include Algeria, which gave for the first time in 2010, and the United Kingdom, which nearly tripled its support for the foundation's health project to $11.2million between 2009 and 2012. Foundation officials have said some of those donations, including Algeria, were oversights and should have been flagged, while others, such as the UK increase, did not qualify as material increases. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect. Clinton and her staff have dismissed this accusation as a political smear. Last month, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman ordered the Donald J. Trump Foundation to stop fundraising in the state, saying it had not registered to solicit donations.