May 22, 2009
Alan Keyes: On Black and Jewish Morality
Source: Alan Keyes
On Obama, blacks and Jews
Alan Keyes asks a very good question:
How could a Jewish people,
so sensitized to the Holocaust,
be so insensitive to and supportive of Abortion.
On Obama, blacks and Jews, by Alan Keyes
The 20th century could well be called the century of Holocaust.
I think it had something to do with the powerful assertion of godless self-sufficiency that characterized its most deadly and infamous ideologies.
The communists, the fascists, the Nazis all have this in common: that they fancy themselves creators of new worlds of human possibility, willing servants of a fantasy in which the future, wrought by human hands, will advance beyond God's limited vision of human nature to birth before the universe the superman, the everlasting Reich, the workers' paradise, the endlessly perfected revolution of hope, change and unimpeded progress.
Obtusely brushing aside the intrinsic contradiction between unlimited being and the objective possibilities of existence, these fantasies of human pridefulness have ended, all of them, in murderous nightmares.
They expanded the possibilities of humanity all right, but only to the extent of adding hitherto unimagined horrors.
As they are part of a people who, on account of their very existence as a people, experienced the full brunt of this murderous pride, it has always seemed incongruous to me that so many Jewish poets (using that word in its broadest sense to include all manner of creative artists) and intellectuals seem at ease with the utopian delusions of the left.
According to the biblical account, the will to assimilate our own destruction is one of the principles of our nature, one of the reasons we are as we are. Just as Eve reached for the deadly fruit, so we are inclined to surrender to the siren song of future godhood that distracts us from the voice and presence of God within. Because, in a sense beyond our rational understanding, we are already what we seek to become; the urge to realize our freedom in action makes it harder for us to accept our freedom in fact. Though time and again we experience, or inflict upon others, the mortal consequences of our vain ambition, we will not let go of it.
In this sense, sincere Christian belief admonishes the pride of every non-Jewish people, for whom it represents the truth that they are not the people chosen by God to be the earthly forbears of the Son of Man.
In its true consequence for the heart, I imagine that the experience of the Holocaust would mean sensitivity so attuned to human suffering and injustice that every such infliction upon anyone, anywhere would resonate within and break your heart anew.
But just as it challenges their pride, so it challenges the humility of the Jews.
In their different ways both Jews and non-Jews are forced to confront the responsibility it implies.
But inasmuch as it is easier to accept a recognized boundary than to constitute and accept it, the Jewish responsibility may be an obligation harder to understand or to forgive.
Why did God choose them to epitomize the sacrifice He makes of Himself for the sake of our existence?
Why would it be for them to bear the wounds He takes upon Himself so that all may be made whole?
My Christian understanding sees this as the experience of Christ upon the cross, and therefore as a possibility made manifest first and especially in Jewish flesh and blood.
But if Christ's crucifixion represents a Jewish experience, so too does his agony in the Garden, his moment of longing for a fate other than sacrifice, in which acceptance of that fate coexists in the instant with the will to push it aside, and by that rejection make for himself another fate devoid of suffering and death.
As there are some Christians who linger in the moment of crucifixion, so I imagine there are Jews who live in the moment of doubt about God's will, when we are apt to be transfixed by our own vision of peace, happiness and hope.
However that may be, there are certainly similarities between the temptations of that moment, and the seductive allure of utopian ideologies that brush aside God's intention for human life in pursuit of a godlike perfection of human will and freedom.
America appears to be in the midst of such temptation now, as it stands preoccupied with a man whose words promise hope and a better world, but whose deeds echo the stolid disregard for innocent life that characterized the murderous ideologies of the 20th century.
The incongruity of this moment appears especially in this: that he could not have achieved his goal without the support of rich and influential people from the very community indelibly scarred by the 20th century's inhuman ambitions.
Lamentably, I believe that their reward for this support will be policies that usher in the destruction of Israel and greatly encourage and strengthen the deadly aims of those in the Islamic world whose lust for its destruction has led them to ingest and act upon some of the foulest ordure left by the Nazis' dysentery of hatred for the Jewish people.
For me the clear forewarning of this probable outcome has been and remains Obama's unswerving commitment to the instrumental destruction of nascent human life in and outside of the womb.
People often speak of the way in which the Nazis and other purveyors of racist ideology play on aesthetic prejudice and sensibility to turn people against the intended victims of racist atrocity – dehumanizing them in order to prepare the perpetration of slaughter.
Racism especially relies upon the denigration of biological origins to achieve this effect, as the Nazis did in their emphasis on the racial contamination supposedly represented by even one iota of Jewish or other "inferior" blood.
What then of the ideology that denies the human nature of all the antecedents of humanity, treating the flourishing seed of human existence as nothing more than slime. "How can anything so unlike what we have become have anything to do with what we are?" it asks suggestively.
I see in this the very ploy used to blind a Christian civilization to the truth of its spiritual origins amongst the seemingly alien Jews.
I see in this the hateful sophistry used to blind supposedly freedom-loving Americans to the crime involved in depriving alien-seeming blacks of the rights the principles of liberty ascribe to all humanity.
How can we hope that such things will "never again" happen if we encourage to its final, anti-humanitarian extreme the mentality that judges by appearances what cannot be understood apart from the transcendent reality that constitutes their meaning?
If we fail to respect the inner being of the cells of nascent life, what of the inner meaning of the perishable flesh and bone, the moistened organization of dust that, to all appearances, we never cease to be?
Tragically, there are too many in the Jewish community as in others (including, of course, the black American community, whose elites are still celebrating Obama's false claim of triumph in their name) who will not see the connection between the mentality of godless, prideful utopianism and the perpetration of atrocities like abortion in the name of human freedom, progress and perfection.
Human beings can offer no boundless hope, except we break the vessels of frail humanity.
That seems like justice only to those who are not among the shards.
Ironic then that Jews and black Americans, two peoples made one by their familiarity with brokenness, should be the instruments though which a man is lifted up whose whole purpose seems to be to bring on for America the destruction associated with this godless, false utopian pride.
You can read further at Solutions
Article located at:
Last Hope for America
Church and State