|The Christian Solution||C   S  |
|Home Page   About TCS   Read the Book   Read the Book (pdf)   Contact Us  |
June 24, 2008
June 20, 2008
Was the Holocaust Inevitable? - By Pat Buchanan
June 24, 2008
Morality — Trotskyite vs. Christian - By Pat Buchanan
Pat Buchanan, in his new book, “Churchill, Hitler and The Unnecessary War” tells us that:
Pat is essentially telling us that if there were no Churchill, there would have been no "Final Solution". Now that alone will have the Jewish media-Scribes calling for a strait jacket to be specially designed and fitted for Pat!
But British Christians may be more interested in knowing that their beloved empire may still be in its fullest glory today had it not been for the disaster of Churchill.
All Eastern European Christians may be more interested to know that they could have been spared 50 years of Stalinist repression had the rants of Churchill been ignored, during both World Wars, ultimately resulting in the Iron Curtain.
And German Christians may be comforted to know that Churchill planned to exterminate German women and children, as the Battle for France started in early 1940, because this will cause a reversal to the old morality that says the horrific premeditated Dresden firebombing in 1945 was justified by the horrific premeditated Holocaust starting in 1942; whereas, the new reality is that the 1942 Holocaust can be justified by the Pharisee's planned usage of Britian to exterminate Germans beginning in 1940.
In a previous article, America Should Choose Better Friends , we were making the point that Stalin was the real threat to Christian civilization, not Hitler. In fact, as pointed out in the article, Hitler was elected by the Christian German people exactly for the sole reason that he was man enough to fight against the Jewish Pharisees, bankrolled by Stalin and his "atheistic" Judeo-Communist thugs, who were creating Judeo-Communist revolutions in German Bavaria and the German capital of Berlin.
Now Pat Buchanan has written a book further exposing the lie all American's have bought into, telling us that America had chosen well when making friends in World War 2. Pat makes excellent points that Winton Churchill was also a character America should not have wholeheartedly supported.
Prior to World War 1, Winston Churchill served as President of the Board of Trade, Home Secretary and First Lord of the Admiralty. When WW1 began, Churchill was still the First Lord of the Admiralty. A highly placed position for one wanting to influence the starting of wars. In America, we learned from our British experience and placed war-making decisions into the hands of civilians. Of course, if those civilians are war-hawks themselves, nothing much is changed.
Hence, Churhill's blood-thirsty, War-Hawk stance on Germany before and during WW1, helped Britain launch a war against a Kaiser who had not fought a war or a battle against anyone in two generations. This is much like our current President who initiates a war with Iraq after Saudi-Arabia attacks us. In this case, Serbia assasinates an Austrian prince, so English sons are marched off to fight Germany's sons.
In launching a World War against a middle-aged Kaiser who had never gone to war, it is instructive to note the war propaganda put out by each country in the conflict. Tell me which poster would make you proud to fight for your country.
The Winston Churchill led war propaganda of Britain had utterly no symbols of Christianity on England's side, but does have the standard propaganda cheap-shots showing drawings of German Christian soldiers bayoneting innocent babies and German Christian nurses pouring water on the ground when helpless wounded British soldiers are begging for water; both highly unlikely by the average German Christian soldier and average German Christian nurse.
The war propaganda of Germany, on the other hand, had many symbols of Christianity and Christian values. I do not speak German, but several looked to depict a religious Christian Crusade. The most striking was a depiction of Jesus Christ himself standing in front of a Christian Cross, giving his blessings to Christian men as they go off to fight in a terrible war. (No wonder the American Jews responded as they did in the next paragraph, for they hate the Crusades and any reference to them.)
The war propaganda of ultra-liberal Woodrow Wilson's America had no Christian symbols that I can detect, unless you can call the "Men Wanted" poster for the Red Cross to be a reference to Christianity.
I have to admit; America produced way more propaganda than any other country and so I stopped looking for Christian symbols after page 16 of 42 pages. Propaganda is understandable in America because, after all, America is a democracy that is ran by the so-called "free will" of Americans. Therefor, if you want "free willed" Americans to vote for your war, which they did NOT want, then the Jewish media-Scribes have to present them with propaganda in order to convince them they really do want the send their sons off to war. Madison Avenue techniques were hence employed.
And so, on the 16th page, while finding no Christian propaganda related to the war effort other than the indirectly related Red Cross, I stopped looking. But interestingly, I did find several bits of Jewish propaganda (And another here. ) for American Christians to fight German Christians. (All way before Hitler and his anti-Semitism. Ever wonder why Hitler disliked Jews a bit?)
Pat tells us that Prussia gained Schleswig, Holstein, Alsace and Lorraine during one 7-year period between 1864 and 1871. From the time of Napoleon's 1812 adventures to the start of WW1 in 1914, those 102-years, outside the 7-years noted, were all peaceful ones. (Schleswig, Alsace and Lorraine would be given up after WW1)
"But in 1914, the Kaiser had been in power for 25 years, was deep into middle age, but had never fought a war nor seen a battle", says Pat Buchanan.
Yet, Churchill himself was characterizing the Kaiser as an evil man bent on world domination. (Churchill would also become famous for characterizing Hitler in much the same way.) Ironically, it would be Churchill's stances during 2 World Wars which would destroy the centuries-old world domination that Great Britain already enjoyed, leading to anti-Christian communists Stalin and Mao, who would both come to dominate Europe and Asia.
The only conclusion was that it was actually Churchill who was "bruising for a fight" with the upcoming economic powerhouse that Germany was fast becoming, and Churchill was therefor largely responsible for the first World War. (Not to forget the history presented in our book "The Christian Solution" showing the economic interests of Anglo Jews, such as the Sadducee Rothschilds, being severely impacted by this up and coming German Christian economic dominance.
Pat clearly shows that the West had nothing tangible to fear from Hitler.
Last Hope for AmericaRecent News
Christian Libertarian: Harmonious Union
Church and State
The Christian Solution © was released March 15, 2008